Platythyrea punctata

AntWiki: The Ants --- Online
Platythyrea punctata
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Ponerinae
Tribe: Platythyreini
Genus: Platythyrea
Species: P. punctata
Binomial name
Platythyrea punctata
(Smith, F., 1858)

Platythyrea punctata casent0006819 profile 1.jpg

Platythyrea punctata casent0006819 dorsal 1.jpg

Specimen Label

Synonyms

The parthenogenic ant Platythyrea punctata is of general interest biogeographically because it occupies a very large range that extends from south Texas to Costa Rica and from Florida to most islands in the West Indies and the Bahamas. It is not known to occur in South America or Trinidad and Tobago. Throughout its range it is found in relatively undisturbed, wooded areas and is probably a native species (Deyrup et al., 1988; Deyrup, 2000). A seeming contradiction to this wide distribution is that it would seem to be a very poor disperser. Winged queens have only been found in Florida, the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic (Wheeler, 1905; K. Kellner, unpublished data). Moreover, queens presumably do not fly, because they lack ocelli, possess poorly developed thoraces and wing muscles (Schilder et al., 1999a) and do not appear to be collected in malaise traps (Deyrup & Trager, 1986). Colonies are presumed to reproduce mainly by splitting or fragmenting (fission or budding) and the ants subsequently disperse by walking over land. (Seal et al. 2011)

At a Glance • Gamergate  • Parthenogenetic  • Limited invasive  

Identification

This species is distinguished from all other North American ants by the following combination of features: the petiole is elongate-rectangular in both dorsal and lateral view; the body is covered with appressed pale pubescence that gives it a silvery appearance; the head and body are heavily punctate, but not striate. In the field it is a medium-sized (about 6 mm) charcoal-colored ant seen dashing over leaf litter, difficult to catch because of its speed and its tendency to hide under fallen leaves when pursued.

Keys including this Species

Distribution

Widely distributed throughout the Caribbean islands, Florida, and Mesoamerica.

In Florida this species occurs from Brevard and Highlands counties south through the Florida Keys. It is probably restricted to frost-free areas or microhabitats. The general range of the species is from southern Florida and southern Texas (not known from intervening states) south into Brazil, including the West Indies (Smith 1979). There is no evidence that P. punctata is exotic in Florida, but it is a species that can live in disturbed areas, the nests are sometimes in dead wood, which makes importation somewhat easier, and unmated workers are able to produce female offspring parthenogenetically (Heinze and Holldobler 1995), so it would be easy to establish a population. On the other hand, it could have arrived by island-hopping through the West Indies. Heinze and Holldobler (1995) report that queens have poorly developed wings; if this were always the case, P. punctata would almost certainly have required assistance to establish an isolated population in Florida. Some Florida queens, however, have well-developed wings, and several winged queens have been collected in yellow bowl traps; these individuals might have walked up the sides of the bowls, but it is more likely that they flew. The origin of the Florida population is one of those questions that may be impossible to answer, unless it should turn out that the Florida population is most closely related to some distant population in South America. For the moment, this can be considered a native Florida species.

Latitudinal Distribution Pattern

Latitudinal Range: 25.075° to -4.034°.

   
North
Temperate
North
Subtropical
Tropical South
Subtropical
South
Temperate

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists

Nearctic Region: United States.
Neotropical Region: Bahamas, Barbados, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, French Guiana, Greater Antilles, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Lesser Antilles, Mexico, Netherlands Antilles, Nicaragua, Panama, Puerto Rico, Saint Lucia, Suriname.


Distribution based on AntMaps

AntMapLegend.png

Distribution based on AntWeb specimens

Check data from AntWeb

Countries Occupied

Number of countries occupied by this species based on AntWiki Regional Taxon Lists. In general, fewer countries occupied indicates a narrower range, while more countries indicates a more widespread species.
pChart

Estimated Abundance

Relative abundance based on number of AntMaps records per species (this species within the purple bar). Fewer records (to the left) indicates a less abundant/encountered species while more records (to the right) indicates more abundant/encountered species.
pChart

Biology

Platythyrea punctata worker. San Cristóbal, República Dominicana. Photograph by Judá Isaí Martínez Uribe. © CC BY-SA 3.0

Brown (1957) reporting in a paper about collections by Robert L. Dressler from Chiapas, Mexico: "from a nest in a fallen log, August 3. Winged forms were present, the males being fully pigmented and apparently active, while most of the females were still in the callow stage or were not yet eclosed. Wilson found this ant foraging on tree trunks after dark in Veracruz and Cuba."

Deyrup, Davis & Cover (2000): This species occurs through the islands of the Caribbean and from Central America north to southern Texas (Brown 1975). The Florida population is currently isolated, though this species might have moved around the Gulf of Mexico to Florida when the climate was warmer. Nests, which often are in dry dead wood, could easily have been shipped to Florida in timber. Unmated workers are able to produce female offspring parthenogenetically (Heinze and Holldobler 1995), so it would be easy to establish a breeding population. Platythyrea punctata is well adapted to disturbed areas, at least in Florida and the Bahamas. The chance that this species was brought by man to south Florida is extremely good; the question is whether such immigrants would have found an indigenous population already established. The first published record that we know of (Creighton 1950) seems rather late for such a large, distinctive species, but these ants are wary and often dart away in the leaf litter before they can be caught.

In Florida nests are in dead logs and dead branches and logs. In Puerto Rico colonies are in rotten logs and stumps (Smith 1936) or in hollow rotting stems of the shrub Psychotria berteriana (Schilder et al. 1999). Workers forage singly (Smith 1936), bringing adult and larval insects back to the nest (Torres 1984).


San Cristóbal, República Dominicana. Video by Judá Isaí Martínez Uribe.

Reproduction by this species is complex, as explained in studied by Heinze and Holldobler (1995) and Schilder et al. (1999). In many nests all individuals appear to be workers. Unmated workers can produce diploid (female) offspring (thelytokous parthenogenesis), as well as occasional males. Usually one female lays most of the eggs in each colony. Surprisingly, there are dominance hierarchies in these colonies, whose individuals must usually be very closely related, but the dominant female is not necessarily the one who lays most of the eggs. A small number of males are produced in some colonies. Queens and individuals intermediate between queens and workers also occur. All females have a spermatheca, although it may be poorly developed, and a small number of individuals of all forms have sperm stored in the spermatheca. There are a few other ant species whose virgin workers are known to produce females, but there are no other ants known to have explored reproductive options as thoroughly as P. punctata.

Reproduction

This ant can reproduce through thelytokous parthenogenesis: mothers can produce diploid, female offspring from unfertilized eggs. Kellner and Heinze (2011) found "that automixis with central fusion and a reduced recombination rate is the most likely mechanism of thelytoky, as in the Cape honeybee and the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Workers in many field colonies from the Caribbean Islands have identical multilocus genotypes and are thus probably clonal."

Reproductive strategy does vary across populations. Workers of from the Caribbean are fully capable of parthenogenesis and produce diploid female offspring from unfertilized eggs, and mated females and males are rare. In contrast, workers in one colony from Costa Rica were incapable of thelytoky; instead mated workers produced all female offspring while the northernmost population from Texas show sexual reproduction, and individuals were incapable of reproduction by thelytoky (Kellner et al., 2013).

Regional Notes

Hispaniola

Mann reported finding foragers "running about on the ground in shady places" (Haiti, Wheeler and Mann 1936). Solitary foragers have also been observed on forest trails in the Dominican Republic (Lubertazzi, personal observation). The number of individuals encountered across a wide area in a number of different locations suggests this species is quite abundant.

Castes

Worker

Images from AntWeb

Platythyrea punctata casent0006088 head 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0006088 profile 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0006088 dorsal 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0006088 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code casent0006088. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by CAS, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Platythyrea punctata casent0103910 head 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0103910 profile 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0103910 dorsal 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0103910 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code casent0103910. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by ABS, Lake Placid, FL, USA.
Platythyrea punctata casent0104740 head 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104740 profile 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104740 dorsal 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104740 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code casent0104740. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by CAS, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Platythyrea punctata psw7638-2 head 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata psw7638-2 profile 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata psw7638-2 dorsal 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata psw7638-2 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code psw7638-2. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by UCDC, Davis, CA, USA.
Platythyrea punctata casent0003323 head 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0003323 profile 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0003323 dorsal 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0003323 label 1.jpg
Worker. Specimen code casent0003323. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by MCZ, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Queen

Images from AntWeb

Platythyrea punctata casent0104429 head 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104429 profile 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104429 dorsal 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104429 label 1.jpg
Queen (alate/dealate). Specimen code casent0104429. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by ABS, Lake Placid, FL, USA.

Male

Images from AntWeb

Platythyrea punctata casent0104428 head 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104428 profile 2.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104428 dorsal 1.jpgPlatythyrea punctata casent0104428 label 1.jpg
Male (alate). Specimen code casent0104428. Photographer April Nobile, uploaded by California Academy of Sciences. Owned by ABS, Lake Placid, FL, USA.

Nomenclature

The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.

  • punctata. Pachycondyla punctata Smith, F. 1858b: 108 (w.m.) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC (“St. Domingo”).
    • Type-material: 1 syntype worker, 1 syntype male.
    • [Note: the syntypes could not be found in BMNH. A queen of this species in BMNH, labelled as type of punctata, is correctly identified but has an incorrect label “P. pilosula Sm.”, and a white, rectangular label “Type. F. Smith coll. 79.22.” The original description of punctata did not mention a queen, and the date, (18)79, is far too late.]
    • Type-locality: St. Domingo (no further data).
    • Type-depository: not in BMNH, presumed lost.
    • Forel, 1893g: 358 (q.). Wheeler, W.M. 1905b: 81 (l.).
    • Combination in Ponera (Pachycondyla): Roger, 1861a: 8;
    • combination in Platythyrea: Roger, 1863a: 173; Roger, 1863b: 17.
    • Status as species: Roger, 1861a: 8; Roger, 1863b: 17, 47; Mayr, 1863: 442; Mayr, 1886c: 359; Dalla Torre, 1893: 27; Forel, 1901f: 335; Wheeler, W.M. 1905b: 80, 120; Wheeler, W.M. 1908a: 123; Wheeler, W.M. 1908b: 159; Wheeler, W.M. 1908e: 401; Forel, 1909a: 242; Wheeler, W.M. 1910g: 561; Emery, 1911d: 30; Wheeler, W.M. 1911a: 21; Wheeler, W.M. 1911b: 168; Forel, 1912c: 35; Wheeler, W.M. 1913b: 481; Wheeler, W.M. 1913d: 239; Wheeler, W.M. & Mann, 1914: 7; Mann, 1916: 403 (in key); Mann, 1920: 404; Mann, 1922: 7; Borgmeier, 1923: 53; Wheeler, W.M. 1923c: 3; Menozzi & Russo, 1930: 150; Santschi, 1931c: 265; Wheeler, W.M. 1936b: 195; Smith, M.R. 1937: 824; Borgmeier, 1937b: 219; Creighton, 1950a: 34; Smith, M.R. 1951a: 783; Brown, 1957e: 229; Smith, M.R. 1958c: 110; Kempf, 1964a: 141; Wilson, 1964b: 4; Smith, M.R. 1967: 346; Kempf, 1972a: 206; Alayo, 1974: 30; Brown, 1975: 9, 54; Smith, D.R. 1979: 1336; Deyrup, et al. 1989: 93; Brandão, 1991: 371; Bolton, 1995b: 336; Deyrup, 2003: 46; Mackay, Mackay, et al. 2008: 209; Branstetter & Sáenz, 2012: 263; Feitosa, 2015c: 99; Wetterer, et al. 2016: 16; Deyrup, 2017: 32; Fernández & Guerrero, 2019: 513; Lubertazzi, 2019: 155.
    • Senior synonym of cineracea: Kempf, 1964a: 141; Brown, 1975: 9; Brandão, 1991: 371; Bolton, 1995b: 337.
    • Senior synonym of pruinosa: Forel, 1901f: 335; Wheeler, W.M. 1908a: 123; Wheeler, W.M. 1908e: 401; Kempf, 1964a: 141; Brown, 1975: 9; Smith, D.R. 1979: 1336; Brandão, 1991: 371; Bolton, 1995b: 337.
    • Distribution: Bahamas, Barbados, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Martinique, Mexico, Panama, Puerto Rico, St Vincent & the Grenadines, U.S.A.
  • cineracea. Platythyrea cineracea Forel, 1886b: xxxix (w.) GUATEMALA.
    • Type-material: holotype worker.
    • Type-locality: Guatemala: Retaluleu (Stoll).
    • Type-depository: MHNG.
    • Forel, 1899c: 4 (m.).
    • Status as species: Emery, 1890a: 57 (in text); Emery, 1890b: 42; Dalla Torre, 1893: 27; Emery, 1894k: 47; Forel, 1899c: 4.
    • Subspecies of punctata: Forel, 1893g: 359; Emery, 1911d: 30; Forel, 1912c: 35; Kempf, 1972a: 206.
    • Junior synonym of punctata: Kempf, 1964a: 141; Brown, 1975: 9; Brandão, 1991: 371; Bolton, 1995b: 336.
  • pruinosa. Platythyrea pruinosa Mayr, 1870b: 962 (w.) MEXICO (no state data).
    • Type-material: holotype worker.
    • Type-locality: Mexico: (no further data) (Norton).
    • Type-depository: NHMW.
    • Forel, 1893g: 358 (m.).
    • Status as species: Forel, 1893g: 358; Dalla Torre, 1893: 27; Forel, 1897b: 298; Forel, 1899c: 4.
    • Subspecies of punctata: Forel, 1901f: 335; Emery, 1911d: 30; Forel, 1912c: 35; Wheeler, W.M. 1917g: 457; Wheeler, W.M. 1923c: 3; Kempf, 1972a: 206.
    • Junior synonym of punctata: Forel, 1901f: 335; Wheeler, W.M. 1908a: 123; Wheeler, W.M. 1908e: 401; Kempf, 1964a: 141; Brown, 1975: 9; Smith, D.R. 1979: 1336; Brandão, 1991: 371; Bolton, 1995b: 337.

Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.

Description

Worker

Length 3 1/4 lines. —Black: the antennae, mandibles, margins of the carinae between the antennae, the legs and apex of the abdomen, ferruginous; the head, thorax, node of the peduncle, and first segment of the abdomen with deep scattered punctures; the insect covered with grey pile; the metatborax truncate, the truncation slightly concave; the node of the peduncle incrassate, elevated to the same height as the first segment, elongated, and forming as it were a basal segment; the apical margin of the first segment ferruginous.

Male

About the same size as the worker, which it greatly resembles, differing in the usual sexual distinctions of a smaller head, larger eyes; the ocelli very bright and glassy; the wings subhyaline, the nervures testaceous, the stigma fuscous.

Type Material

Hab. St. Domingo.

References

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

  • Ahuatzin D. A., E. J. Corro, A. Aguirre Jaimes, J. E. Valenzuela Gonzalez, R. Machado Feitosa, M. Cezar Ribeiro, J. Carlos Lopez Acosta, R. Coates, W. Dattilo. 2019. Forest cover drives leaf litter ant diversity in primary rainforest remnants within human-modified tropical landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation 28(5): 1091-1107.
  • Alayo D. P. 1974. Introduccion al estudio de los Himenopteros de Cuba. Superfamilia Formicoidea. Academia de Ciencias de Cuba. Instituto de Zoologia. Serie Biologica no.53: 58 pp. La Habana.
  • Boer P. 2019. Ants of Curacao, species list. Accessed on January 22 2019 at http://www.nlmieren.nl/websitepages/SPECIES%20LIST%20CURACAO.html
  • Boer P. 2019. Ants of Saba, species list. Accessed on January 22 2019 at http://www.nlmieren.nl/websitepages/SPECIES%20LIST%20SABA.html
  • Castano-Meneses, G., M. Vasquez-Bolanos, J. L. Navarrete-Heredia, G. A. Quiroz-Rocha, and I. Alcala-Martinez. 2015. Avances de Formicidae de Mexico. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
  • Dattilo W. et al. 2019. MEXICO ANTS: incidence and abundance along the Nearctic-Neotropical interface. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2944
  • De La Mora, A., and S. M. Philpott. 2010. Wood-nesting ants and their parasites in forests and coffee agroecosystems. Environmental Entomology 39: 1473-1481.
  • De la Mora, A., C. J. Murnen, and S. M. Philpott. 2013. Local and landscape drivers of ant-communities in Neotropical coffee landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 871-888.
  • De la Mora, A., G. Perez-Lachaud, J. P.Lachaud, and S. M. Philpott. 2015. Local and landscape drivers of ant parasitism in a coffee landscape. Environmental Entomology 44: 939-950.
  • Deyrup M., L. Davis, and S. Buckner. 1998. Composition of the ant fauna of three Bahamian islands. Proceedings of the seventh symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. 23-32. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas
  • Emery C. 1890. Studii sulle formiche della fauna neotropica. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Ital. 22: 38-8
  • Emery C. 1894. Estudios sobre las hormigas de Costa Rica. Anales del Museo Nacional de Costa Rica 1888-1889: 45-64.
  • Emery C. 1911. Hymenoptera. Fam. Formicidae. Subfam. Ponerinae. Genera Insectorum 118: 1-125.
  • Fernandes, P.R. XXXX. Los hormigas del suelo en Mexico: Diversidad, distribucion e importancia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
  • Fernandez Triana J. L., H. Sariol, M. A. Vega Castillo, S. Ricardo, M. Gonzalez, and E. P. Ferrer. 2002. Datos preliminares dobre la biodiversidad del orden Hymenoptera en la provincia Granma, Cuba. Bol. S.E.A. 31: 43-48.
  • Fernández F., and T. M. Arias-Penna. 2008. Las hormigas cazadoras en la región Neotropical. Pp. 3-39 in: Jiménez, E.; Fernández, F.; Arias, T.M.; Lozano-Zambrano, F. H. (eds.) 2008. Sistemática, biogeografía y conservación de las hormigas cazadoras de Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, xiv + 609 pp.
  • Fernández Triana J. L., J. L. Fontenla, E. Portuondo Ferrer, and J. A. Genaro. 2005. Especies de himenópteros registrados en el Parque Nacional La Bayamesa, Cuba, 17-22 de junio del 2003 y 2-10 de febrero del 2004. In Maceira F., D., A.Fong G., W. S. Alverson, y/and T. Wachter, eds. 2005. Cuba: Parque Nacional La Bayamesa. Rapid Biological Inventories Report 13. The Field Museum, Chicago.
  • Fernández, F. and S. Sendoya. 2004. Lista de las hormigas neotropicales. Biota Colombiana Volume 5, Number 1.
  • Fontanla Rizo J.L. 1997. Lista preliminar de las hormigas de Cuba. Cocuyo 6: 18-21.
  • Fontenla J. L. 2005. Species of ants (Formicidae) recorded in the Sierra de Cubitas and adjacent areas, Camagüey Province, 16-19 September 2002. In: Díaz, L., M., W. S. Alverson, A. Barreto V., y / and T. Wachter. 2006. Cuba: Camagüey, Sierra de Cubitas. Rapid Biological Inventories Report 08. The Field Museum, Chicago
  • Fontenla J. L., and J. Alfonso-Simonetti. 2018. Classification of Cuban ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) into functional groups. Poeyana Revista Cubana de Zoologia 506: 21-30.
  • Fontenla Rizo J. L. 1993. Mirmecofauna de Isla de la Juventud y de algunos cayos del archipielago cubano. Poeyana. Instituto de Ecologia y Sistematica, Academia de Ciencias de Cuba 444:1-7.
  • Fontenla Rizo J. L. 1997. Lista preliminar de las hormigas de Cuba (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Cocuyo 6: 18-21.
  • Forel A. 1897. Quelques Formicides de l'Antille de Grenada récoltés par M. H. H. Smith. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London. 1897: 297-300.
  • Forel A. 1901. Nouvelles espèces de Ponerinae. (Avec un nouveau sous-genre et une espèce nouvelle d'Eciton). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 9: 325-353.
  • Forel A. 1912. Formicides néotropiques. Part I. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique. 56: 28-49.
  • Franco W., N. Ladino, J. H. C. Delabie, A. Dejean, J. Orivel, M. Fichaux, S. Groc, M. Leponce, and R. M. Feitosa. 2019. First checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of French Guiana. Zootaxa 4674(5): 509-543.
  • Galkowski C. 2016. New data on the ants from the Guadeloupe (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bull. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux 151, 44(1): 25-36.
  • Hartmann, A. and J. Heinze. Lay Eggs, Live Longer: Division of Labor and Life Span in a Clonal Ant Species. Evolution 57(10):2424-2429
  • INBio Collection (via Gbif)
  • Kempf, W.W. 1972. Catalago abreviado das formigas da regiao Neotropical (Hym. Formicidae) Studia Entomologica 15(1-4).
  • Kusnezov N. 1963. Zoogeografia de las hormigas en sudamerica. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 19: 25-186
  • Larsen, A., and S. M. Philpott. 2010. Twig-nesting ants: the hidden predators of the coffee berry borer in Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica 42: 342-347.
  • Longino J. T. L., and M. G. Branstetter. 2018. The truncated bell: an enigmatic but pervasive elevational diversity pattern in Middle American ants. Ecography 41: 1-12.
  • Longino J. T., J. Coddington, and R. K. Colwell. 2002. The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83: 689-702.
  • Longino J. et al. ADMAC project. Accessed on March 24th 2017 at https://sites.google.com/site/admacsite/
  • Maes, J.-M. and W.P. MacKay. 1993. Catalogo de las hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de Nicaragua. Revista Nicaraguense de Entomologia 23.
  • Mann W. M. 1920. Additions to the ant fauna of the West Indies and Central America. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 42: 403-439.
  • Menozzi C, Russo G. 1930. Contributo alla conoscenza della mirmecofauna della Repubblica Dominicana (Antille). Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura. Portici. 24: 148-173.
  • Mirmecofauna de la reserva ecologica de San Felipe Bacalar
  • Osorio-Perez K., M. F. Barberena-Arias, and T. M. Aide. 2007. Changes in Ant Species Richness and Composition During Plant Secondary Succession in Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science 43(2): 244-253.
  • Perez-Gelabert D. E. 2008. Arthropods of Hispaniola (Dominican Republic and Haiti): A checklist and bibliography. Zootaxa 1831:1-530.
  • Portuondo E. F., and J. L. Reyes. 2002. Mirmecofauna de los macizos montañosos de Sierra Maestra y Nipe-Sagua-Baracoa. Cocuyo 12: 10-13
  • Portuondo E. F., and J. L. Reyes. 2006. Species of hymenopterans recorded in Siboney-Juticí Ecological Reserve, Santiago de Cuba Province, compiled from collections during the rapid inventory of 27-28 September 2002. Fong G., A., D. Maceira F., W. S. Alverson, y / and J. M. Shopland, eds. 2005. Cuba: Siboney-Juticí. Rapid Biological Inventories Report 10. The Field Museum, Chicago.
  • Portuondo Ferrer E., and J. L. Fernández Triana. 2005. Species of hymenopterans (bees, wasps, and ants) recorded in Alejandro de Humboldt National Park, from literature records, revision of the collection at BIOECO, and collections before and during the rapid inventory, 12-22 February 2004. In Fong G., A., D. Maceira F., W. S. Alverson, y/and T. Wachter, eds. 2005. Cuba: Parque Nacional “Alejandro de Humboldt.” Rapid Biological Inventories Report 14. The Field Museum, Chicago.
  • Portuondo Ferrer, E. and J. Fernandez Triana. Biodiversidad del orden Hymenoptera en Los Macizos Montanosos de Cuba Oriental. Boletin S.E.A. 35:121-136.
  • Quiroz-Robledo, L.N. and J. Valenzuela-Gonzalez. 2007. Distribution of poneromorph ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Mexican state of Morelos. Florida Entomologist 90(4):609-615
  • Reyes, J. L. "Inventario de la colección de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) del Centro Oriental de Ecosistemas y Biodiversidad, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba." Boletín de la Sociedad Aragonesa 36 (2005): 279-283.
  • Santschi F. 1931. Fourmis de Cuba et de Panama. Revista de Entomologia (Rio de Janeiro). 1: 265-282.
  • Seal, J. N., K. Kellner, A. Trindl, and J. Heinze. 2011. Phylogeography of the parthenogenic ant Platythyrea punctata: highly successful colonization of the West Indies by a poor disperser. Journal of Biogeography 38: 868-882.
  • Smith M. R. 1937. The ants of Puerto Rico. Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico 20: 819-875.
  • Torres J.A. 1984. Niches and Coexistence of Ant Communities in Puerto Rico: Repeated Patterns. Biotropica 16(4): 284-295.
  • Torres, Juan A. and Roy R. Snelling. 1997. Biogeography of Puerto Rican ants: a non-equilibrium case?. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:1103-1121.
  • Vasquez-Bolanos M. 2011. Checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Mexico. Dugesiana 18(1): 95-133.
  • Vásquez-Bolaños M. 2011. Lista de especies de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) para México. Dugesiana 18: 95-133
  • Wheeler W. M. 1905. The ants of the Bahamas, with a list of the known West Indian species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 21: 79-135.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1908. The ants of Jamaica. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 24: 159-163.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1908. The ants of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 24: 117-158.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1913. The ants of Cuba. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 54: 477-505.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1917. Jamaican ants collected by Prof. C. T. Brues. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 61: 457-471.
  • Wheeler W. M., and W. M. Mann. 1914. The ants of Haiti. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 33: 1-61.
  • Wheeler, William Morton. 1911. Additions to the Ant-Fauna of Jamaica. Bulletin American Museum of Natural History. 30:21-29.
  • Wheeler, William Morton. 1923. Report on the Ants. The University of Iowa Studies in Natural History. 10(3):3-9.
  • Wheeler, William Morton. 1936. Ants From Hispaniola and Mona Island. Bulletin: Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. 80(2):192-211.