|Oecodoma quadrispinosa, now Lophomyrmex quadrispinosus|
|Based on Ward et al. (2014) and Blaimer et al. (2018).|
A small well defined genus of Oriental and Indo-Australian ants.
- 1 Identification
- 2 Distribution
- 3 Biology
- 4 Castes
- 5 Morphology
- 6 Nomenclature
- 7 References
Rigato (1994) - Lophomyrmex workers are small, slender, yellowish or brownish ants; both workers and females are easily identifiable by means of the presence of the following autapomorphies: (a) mandibles armed with an apical and one pre apical tooth, followed, on both masticatory and basal margin, by an uninterrupted series of blunt, irregular denticles; (b) anterior clypeal margin with a median anteriorly protruding point. Further, workers have the pronotum either with dorsolateral, irregular, sharp borders or with anterolaterally directed dorsal teeth, which can also be interpreted as an autapomorphic trait.
The genus is divided in two equally-sized groups: the quadrispinosus-group (birmanus, kali, opaciceps, quadrispinosus and taivanae), whose species have two anterodorsal pronotal teeth, and the bedoti-group (ambiguus, bedoti, longicornis, lucidus and striatulus), where the pronotum is sharply and irregularly dorsolaterally marginated. Besides this major diagnostic character, Lophomyrmex seems rather constant in all the other features.
Keys including this Genus
Keys to Species in this Genus
- Key to Lophomyrmex species
- Key to Lophomyrmex of South China, Indo-China and Thailand
- Key to Lophomyrmex of India
Rigato (1994) - Some species (Lophomyrmex ambiguus, Lophomyrmex longicornis, Lophomyrmex lucidus, Lophomyrmex opaciceps and Lophomyrmex taivanae) seem to have a rather restricted distribution, but others (Lophomyrmex bedoti, Lophomyrmex birmanus and Lophomyrmex quadrispinosus) are widespread over large areas. Lophomyrmex kali and Lophomyrmex striatulus were collected in just one locality and their actual range can not be confidently established.
Distribution and Richness based on AntMaps
Rigato (1994) - Lophomyrmex species are common ground dwellers and surface scavengers in secondary forest. Moffett (1986) briefly surveyed the foraging behavior of L. bedoti and L. opaciceps in Malaysia and Indonesia. Nests of Lophomyrmex are usually located near the base of trees and seem moderately populous. Lophomyrmex workers forage following narrow trunk trails from which they depart singly to collect food. The more persistent pathways are surrounded by walls built with soil or sand particles; sometimes the trails are wholly subterranean and undetectable. The diet is heterogeneous and includes many kinds of dead and living invertebrates: isopods, arachnids, termites, cockroaches, flies, larvae of various insect groups, as well as other ants. Moreover Lophomyrmex workers are enticed by sugar baits and vegetable oil, but not at all by seeds. The peculiar mandibular dentition of Lophomyrmex appears well suited for cutting both prey and the limbs of foreign ants; Lophomyrmex are well adapted for hunting other invertebrates notwithstanding their reduced sting.
- 2n = 38 (Sarawak) (Tjan et al., 1986).
All Records for Genus
|Lophomyrmex||38||Sarawak||Tjan et al., 1986|
|Lophomyrmex bedoti||38||India; Malaysia||Imai et al., 1983; Imai et al., 1984|
The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's New General Catalogue, a catalogue of the world's ants.
- LOPHOMYRMEX [Myrmicinae: Pheidolini]
- Lophomyrmex Emery, 1892a: 114. Type-species: Oecodoma quadrispinosa, by monotypy.
- [Lophomyrmex as junior synonym of Monomorium: Dlussky, 1997: 57 (error).]
Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.
Monomorphic, terrestrial myrmicine ants, with the following combination of characters.
(1) Palp formula 2,2.
(2) Mandibles with the following dentition: masticatory margin with apical and one preapical tooth, followed by an enlarged denticle; these then followed by a continuous series of irregular small denticles, usually with a larger one at about the midlength of the row; basal margin always finely serrated, continuing the denticulation of the masticatory margin.
(3) Clypeus vaulted in the middle, with a protruding blunt tooth at the midpoint of its anterior margin. At each side of this tooth there is a strong seta, anteriorly directed and slightly curved downward. The clypeus is posteriorly broadly inserted between the frontal lobes (wider than a single lobe at this point).
(4) Frontal lobes weakly converging anteriorly; frontal carinae and antennal scrobes absent; frontal triangle rather well defined.
(5) Antenna ll-segmented with a distinct 3-segmented club, which is longer than the rest of the funiculus.
(6) Eyes at about the midlength of the head in full-face view; oval in profile, with a slight antero-ventral point.
(7) Pronotum domed in profile, with the dorsum quite flattened and the humerus bearing a single erect hair. In dorsal view the sides of the upper face may be either irregularly marginate or armed anteriorly with a horizontal flat tooth or spine formed by a lateral and an anterior edge. When present the teeth are outward and forward-directed.
(8) Promesonotal suture vestigial. Mesonotum in lateral view gradually sloping toward the propodeum, it bears around its midlength a prominence, sometimes very low.
(9) Metanotal groove well defined, slightly to deeply impressed in profile.
(10) Metapleural gland present.
(11) Propodeum bispinose, spines well developed and long.
(12) Propodeal spiracle in side view circular and located near the base of the spine.
(13) Propodeal lobes indistinct.
(14) Metasternal process present, low and rounded.
(15) Posterior portion of the metasternum closed, membraneous ligament at the articulation of the petiole not visible.
(16) Tibial spur of middle and hind legs present and simple, not clearly visible.
(17) Petiole with a distinct, fairly long, peduncle, and with a high node which is not triangular in shape in profile.
(18) Petiolar spiracle placed at the midlength of the peduncle.
(19) Postpetiole wider and usually slightly higher than the petiole: the tergite much more developed than the sternite.
(20) First gastral tergite large, but ventrally not extensively overlapping the sternite. Anterior corners of the gaster, at the sides of the postpetiolar insertion, obtuse, not protruding anteriorly.
(21) Sting reduced.
(22) Sculpture usually poorly developed, mostly reticulate: head, pronotum and gaster usually shining, at least in part. Mandibles striate at least on their basal half. Clypeus finely shagreened or reticulate with posteriormost median portion smooth and shining. Colour varying from pale brownish yellow to medium brown.
(23) Long erect hairs present throughout the body excluding the dorsum of the propodeum. Pubescence and oblique tiny hairs sparse on the body; appendages with abundant, long, subdecumbent to oblique pubescence. Eyes covered with very small erect hairs, usually hooked at their tip.
(based on quadrispinosus, bedoti, lucidus and an unassociated specimen).
Much larger, darker and more sculptured than the worker; mandibles, clypeus and antenna as in the worker. The other characters as follows:
(1) Palp formula 2,2.
(2) Head either trapezoidal (quadrispinosus, bedoti, lucidus), broader than long and anteriorly narrowed, or approximately square in shape (unassociated female).
(3) Eyes at the midlength of the head in full-face view.
(4) Ocelli well developed, separated from one another by a distance more than their maximum diameter (quadrispinosus, bedoti, lucidus) or approximately equal to it (unassociated female).
(5) Alitrunk much longer than wide. Scutum covering the pronotum in dorsal view. Parapsidal furrows weak. Axillae well separated, but linked by a strip that may be either thin or quite broad. Metanotum visible from above. Propodeum bidentate or bispinose.
(6) Propodeal spiracle approximately elliptical or circular; in lateral view its opening is posteriorly directed and sometimes slightly ventrally directed. The spiracle is anteriorly placed: a little above the midheight of the propodeum and much nearer the anterior suture than the posterior propodeal surface.
(7) Petiole pedunculate with the node triangular and rounded in profile. A weak anterior subpetiolar prominence present.
(8) Postpetiole massive. wider than the petiole in dorsal view and broadly articulated to the gaster.
(9) Sculpture as follows:
Mandibles longitudinally striate. Clypeus smooth and shining at least posteriorly. Head dull. strongly reticulate. with some overlapping fine, approximately longitudinal, rugulation, especially on the genae and frons. Alitrunk mostly punctured and reticulate. Scutum approximately subopaque, less smooth than the scutellum. Mesopleuron mostly unsculptured and shining. Petiole and postpetiole microreticulate and opaque. Gaster generally shining, with tiny, dense punctures from which pubescence and pilosity rise.
(10) Body colour varying from light (bedoti, lucidus and unassociated specimen) to dark brown (quadrispinosus).
(11) Pubescence abundant and dense all over the body and the appendages, usually decumbent to subdecumbent. Erect hairs sparse on the dorsum of the body and on the ventral surface of the head. Eyes covered with dense hairs as in the worker.
(12) Forewings with one cubital cell and m-cu vein; not hyaline: either uniformly infuscated (quadrispinosus, bedoti) or weakly yellowish throughout (lucidus).
based on quadrispinosus, bedoti and lucidus.
(1) Palp formula 2.2.
(2) Head (including the eyes) wider than long.
(3) Mandibles moderately developed, but not touching each other when fully closed; armed with a single apical tooth, which may be sometimes worn out (quadrispinosus, bedoti) or serrated on its masticatory and basal margin (lucidus). The angle between the margins is widely rounded.
(4) Clypeus vaulted in the middle, very poorly angled at the midpoint of the anterior border.
(5) Frontal lobes absent. Antennal sockets visible in dorsal view.
(6) Frontal triangle large, heavily sculptured and opaque, not well defined, sometimes distinctly transversally rugose (quadrispinosus).
(7) Antenna 13-segmented without a club. Scape short and thick, shorter than any funicular segment excluding the first (quadrispinosus) or about as long as these (bedoti and lucidus). First funicular segment approximately half as long as the scape, but not swollen. Other funicular segments very elongated and of similar length.
(8) Eyes at the midlength of the head sides in full-face view, well separated from the mandibular insertion and from the occipital head surface.
(9) Ocelli not surmounting a turret and separated from one another by much more than their diameter.
(10) Alitrunk elongated. Scutum well above the pronotum, without notauli and with weak but distinct parapsidal furrows. Axillae small and well separated, linked by a very narrow strip (quadrispinosus) or a quite wide one (bedoti and lucidus). Metanotum visible from above. Propodeum bidentate or weakly bituberculate.
(11) Propodeal spiracle as in the female.
(12) Petiole pedunculate. Its node broadly triangular with a rounded top in profile. sometimes very low (bedoti and lucidus).
(13) Postpetiole in dorsal view much wider than the petiole. thick and broadly attached to the gaster. The tergite much more developed than the sternite.
(14) Sculpture as follows:
Head well sculptured and opaque, only the centre of the clypeus smooth and shining. Alitrunk not as sculptured as the head. only the propodeum fully opaque. Middle of the scutum slightly shining, scutellum fairly smooth in the middle. Petiole and post petiole dull, mostly reticulate. Gaster smooth.
(15) Colour from brownish yellow (bedoti and lucidus) to dark brown.
(16) Pubescence long and rich throughout the body. Pilosity as in the female. Eyes covered with dense, very short erect hairs.
(17) Wings as in the female.
- Ashmead, W. H. 1905c. A skeleton of a new arrangement of the families, subfamilies, tribes and genera of the ants, or the superfamily Formicoidea. Can. Entomol. 37: 381-384 (page 383, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Myrmicini)
- Bolton, B. 1987. A review of the Solenopsis genus-group and revision of Afrotropical Monomorium Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. 54: 263-452 (page 265, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologeton genus group)
- Bolton, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 222 pp. (page 106, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologetini [Pheidologetonini])
- Bolton, B. 1995b. A new general catalogue of the ants of the world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 504 pp. (page 248, catalogue)
- Bolton, B. 2003. Synopsis and Classification of Formicidae. Mem. Am. Entomol. Inst. 71: 370pp (page 231, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidolini)
- Dalla Torre, K. W. von. 1893. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Vol. 7. Formicidae (Heterogyna). Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 289 pp. (page 74, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae)
- Dlussky, G. M. 1997b. Genera of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Baltic amber. Paleontol. Zh. 31: 616-627 (page 625, Lophomyrmex as junior synonym of Monomorium (error))
- Dlussky, G. M.; Fedoseeva, E. B. 1988. Origin and early stages of evolution in ants. Pp. 70-144 in: Ponomarenko, A. G. (ed.) Cretaceous biocenotic crisis and insect evolution. Moskva: Nauka, 232 pp. (page 80, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologetini)
- Eguchi, K., Bui, T.V. & Yamane, S. 2011. Generic synopsis of the Formicidae of Vietnam. Part 1 – Myrmicinae and Pseudomyrmecinae. Zootaxa 2878: 1-61. PDF
- Emery, C. 1892a. Sopra alcune formiche raccolte dall'Ingegnere L. Bricchetti Robecchi nel paese dei Somali. [part]. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. 32[=(2(12): 110-112 (page 114, Lophomyrmex as genus)
- Emery, C. 1895l. Die Gattung Dorylus Fab. und die systematische Eintheilung der Formiciden. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. Geogr. Biol. Tiere 8: 685-778 (page 770, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Solenopsidini)
- Emery, C. 1914e. Intorno alla classificazione dei Myrmicinae. Rend. Sess. R. Accad. Sci. Ist. Bologna Cl. Sci. Fis. (n.s.) 18: 29-42 (page 41, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologetini [subtribe Lophomyrmicini])
- Emery, C. 1924f . Hymenoptera. Fam. Formicidae. Subfam. Myrmicinae. [concl.]. Genera Insectorum 174C: 207-397 (page 208, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologetini)
- Ettershank, G. 1966. A generic revision of the world Myrmicinae related to Solenopsis and Pheidologeton (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Aust. J. Zool. 14: 73-171 (page 81, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologeton genus group)
- Forel, A. 1917. Cadre synoptique actuel de la faune universelle des fourmis. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 51: 229-253 (page 243, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologetini)
- Hölldobler, B.; Wilson, E. O. 1990. The ants. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, xii + 732 pp. (page 16, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologetini)
- Rigato, F. 1994b. Revision of the myrmicine ant genus Lophomyrmex, with a review of its taxonomic position (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst. Entomol. 19: 47-60 (page 50, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidolini)
- Wheeler, G. C.; Wheeler, J. 1985b. A simplified conspectus of the Formicidae. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 111: 255-264 (page 257, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Pheidologetini)
- Wheeler, W. M. 1910b. Ants: their structure, development and behavior. New York: Columbia University Press, xxv + 663 pp. (page 141, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Solenopsidini)
- Wheeler, W. M. 1922i. Ants of the American Museum Congo expedition. A contribution to the myrmecology of Africa. VII. Keys to the genera and subgenera of ants. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 45: 631-710 (page 663, Lophomyrmex in Myrmicinae, Solenopsidini)