Wheeler, W.M., 1914
|Based on van Elst et al. (2021).|
This species has only been collected a few times and little is known about its biology.
- 1 Identification
- 2 Distribution
- 3 Biology
- 4 Castes
- 5 Nomenclature
- 6 References
- 7 References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics
Key to Myrmecocystus subgenus Myrmecocystus species.
Worker - Numerous fully erect hairs on malar area, thoracic dorsum and appendages; propodeal dorsum evenly convex, juncture of dorsal and posterior faces broadly rounded; metanotal groove distinct; eye with numerous erect hairs longer than diameter of facets. Female - Unknown. Male - Forewing without fringe hairs on apical margin; eye with numerous erect hairs longer than diameter of facets. (Snelling 1976)
Keys including this Species
Mexico. Known only from the states of Hidalgo and Puebla.
Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Distribution based on AntMaps
Distribution based on AntWeb specimens
Check data from AntWeb
Snelling (1976) - Little is known of this species. Elevation ranges from 6700-8600 feet. The specimens taken by L. B. Carney were "at light," indicating nocturnal foraging, as expected.
One sample was taken on an arid hilltop in a maguey field at the summit of Hwy. 85; the knoll, although surrounded by maguey plantings, was uncultivated, several acres in extent, and consisted largely of arborescent Yucca and Acacia. The nest was marked by a circular crateriform tumulus consisting of coarse particles of uniform size; the entrance was about 15 mm in diameter. No ants were foraging at 1530 when the nest was discovered, although the sky was cloudy and there were scattered light rain showers. Repletes, secured within 45 cm of the surface, were apparently known to local residents, who identified them as “venitas.”
Another sample was also taken in an area adjacent to maguey plantings, but the habitat was less severely stripped of native vegetation, especially on nearby slopes, too steep for cultivation. At 1200 hours the sky was heavily overcast; workers of Myrmecocystus melanoticus were foraging on nearby plants, some gathering nectar, others scavenging. The tumulus was lower than that of the previous sample and composed of finer particles and the entrance smaller.
The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.
- melanoticus. Myrmecocystus mexicanus var. melanoticus Wheeler, W.M. 1914b: 57 (w.m.) MEXICO. Raised to species: Snelling, R.R. 1976: 116.
Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.
Snelling (1976) - It is my opinion that this species is the same as Wesmael's mexicanus, a conclusion based largely on distributional evidence. Since the problem appears insoluble, I have elected not to modify the traditional interpretation of Wesmael's name.
The relationship between Myrmecocystus melanoticus and Myrmecocystus mexicanus is a very close one and the above problem may be purely academic. It is quite possible that the two species may prove to be one when more material from central Mexico becomes available. Additional samples from western Puebla and Hidalgo, as well as from Tlaxcala, Mexico, and Queretaro may clarify the status or these names.
Although melanoticus is a darker form, mexicanus becomes darker in the southern portions of its range, and samples from near Dolores Hidalgo, in the State of Guanajuato, are nearly as dark as melanoticus. The size of melanoticus is, to judge from the material available, notably less variable than that of mexicanus. I also regard it as a smaller species, even though its size is completely overlapped by that of mexicanus. In all sizes of workers, especially among the smaller individuals, the head appears less elongate. Thus, about 75% of the melanoticus studied have a CI in excess of 81, while this is true of about 35% of the mexicanus workers. The CI of both species are plotted in Fig. 272. As will be seen, the regression zone of melanoticus, while contiguous with and, to some extent lapped by that of mexicanus, persistently presents higher values. Similarly, melanoticus possesses a relatively shorter scape and when SL is plotted against HL (Fig. 273) yields a consistently lower value than does mexicanus.
The number of mandibular teeth is variable in both species, varying from eight to ten. However, while the mandible of melanoticus most commonly has nine teeth, specimens with eight on one or both mandibles are common. Ten mandibular teeth is a very rare occurrence in this species. Conversely, while mexicanus typically also has novemdentate mandibles, individuals with ten (or even eleven) teeth are common; an eight-toothed mandible is rare. As a rule, the space between the basal and subbasal teeth is larger in area than the basal tooth in melanoticus, smaller in mexicanus.
In the length of the hairs on the eyes these ants appear to be different. In melanoticus there are ten or more erect hairs in the central part of the eye; these hairs are from 0.025-0.037 mm long and exceed the diameter of the eye facets. Scattered erect hairs are present on the eyes of mexicanus, but even in the largest individuals are less than 0.017 mm in length.
It is possible that melanoticus is nothing more than a geographic segregate of mexicanus, a subspecies. I do not believe this to be true, since mexicanus in the southern parts of its range, shows little demonstrable tendency to assume the characteristics of melanoticus, other than in color. Thus the Cephalic Index and Scape Index of mexicanus remain "normal" as does the length of the ocular hairs. Neither does the mandibular dentition vary toward the melanoticus condition. If a subspecies situation were the case, then I would expect to find such tendencies in southern populations of mexicanus. I have thus chosen to accord full specific status to melanoticus until such a time as additional material permits a complete re-evaluation of this form.
Snelling (1976) - Measurements. HL 1.10-1.83 (1.50); HW 0.63-1.73 (1.30); SL 1.47-2.03 (1.80); WL 2.0-3.0 (2.4); PW 0.6-1.2 (0.9).
Head: Longer than broad in all sizes, CI 76-96 (87); distinctly shorter than scape, SI 110-136 (120). In frontal view, margins slightly convergent toward mandibular insertions in smaller workers, slightly to moderately convex in larger workers; top of eye much below top of occiput, occipital angle barely indicated in large workers, not at all in smallest, occipital margin flat. Eye moderately large, 1.08-1.50 (1.50) x length of first flagellomere; OMD 1.20-1.57 (1.20) x EL. Mandible with eight or nine teeth, space between penultimate and basal teeth often larger in area than basal tooth.
Thorax: Slender, PW 0.32-0.40 (0.36) x WL. Basal face of propodeum gently to strongly convex, without clearly demarked juncture with posterior face. Metanotal depression present.
Petiole: Cuneiform in profile, crest bluntly rounded; from front, crest narrow, either not notched or with a broad, shallow concavity.
Vestiture: Dorsa of head, thorax and first three terga with abundant fine, appressed pubescence, longest on front of head.
Malar area with ten or more erect hairs on each side; erect hairs on head mostly less than 0.10 mm, except beneath and along clypeal apex. Eye with scattered erect hairs which are longer (0.025-0.037 mm) than the diameter of an ocular facet. Erect hairs of thoracic dorsum numerous, evenly distributed, of about equal length, longest about 0.10 mm. Petiolar node with conspicuous short erect hairs. Discal hairs abundant on terga, about 0.10 mm on disc of second, longer along apical margins and on apical segments. Sterna with hairs sparser and longer. Appendages with abundant short (less than 0.10 mm) erect to suberect hairs, including lower and inner surfaces of fore femur.
Integument: Front of head moderately shiny, closely micropunctate and with scattered coarser shallower punctures (from which arise the erect hairs); micropunctures coarser on frontal lobes. Clypeus shinier than frons, with coarse and fine punctures closely interspersed, median line shinier, less closely punctate. Integument otherwise finely shagreened and slightly shiny.
Color: Light to medium yellowish brown, appendages and lower portions of face usually contrastingly lighter; gaster usually a little darker.
Snelling (1976) - Measurements. HL 0.83-0.97 (0.97); HW 0.77-0.93 (0.93); SL 0.93-1.17 (1.17); EL 0.37-0.40 (0.40); WL 2.0-2.3 (2.3); PW 1.2-1.3 (1.2).
Head: In frontal view sides of head slightly convergent toward mandibular insertion; head slightly longer than broad, CI 92-97 (97); distinctly shorter than scape , SI 112-121 (121); OMD 0.46-0.58 (0.58) x EL. Anterior ocellus a little smaller than lateral ocellus; IOD 2.7-3.0 (3.0) x OD; OOD 2.0-2.3 (2.3) x OD. Mandible with preapical notch and two or three poorly defined teeth basad.
Thorax: Moderately robust, PW 0.57-0.60 x WL. Propodeum without defined basal face.
Petiole: Cuneate in profile; crest, in frontal view, broadly notched; from above about twice wider than long.
Vestiture: Erect hairs yellowish, abundant on all body surfaces and appendages; longest scutellar hairs shorter than MOD. Fore and hind wing without fringe hairs.
Pubescence apparently generally distributed and fully appressed, dense on first three terga (available specimens are very badly rubbed).
Integument: Slightly shiny, lightly shagreened, with abundant micropunctures; clypeus roughened and dull; scutellum smoother and shinier than scutum.
Color: Uniformly light brownish, appendages more yellowish. Wings hyaline, veins and stigma yellowish.
Described by Wheeler from an unspecified number of specimens collected at Pachuca, Hidalgo, MEXICO, by W. M. Mann. Five workers and one male, marked as cotypes, are in the Museum of Comparative Zoology; four workers and two males, unmarked, are in the National Museum of Natural History. A Lectotype worker and lectoallotype male have been marked and returned to the MCZ; the remaining lectoparatype material in the LACM (one worker) and MCZ (three workers). The USNM specimens, although indubitably of the original species, were not clearly marked as types and are here excluded.
- Snelling, R. R. 1976. A revision of the honey ants, genus Myrmecocystus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angel. Cty. Sci. Bull. 24: 1-163 (page 116, Raised to species)
- van Elst, T., Eriksson, T.H., Gadau, J., Johnson, R.A., Rabeling, C., Taylor, J.E., Borowiec, M.L. 2021. Comprehensive phylogeny of Myrmecocystus honey ants highlights cryptic diversity and infers evolution during aridification of the American Southwest. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 155, 107036 (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2020.107036).
- Wheeler, W. M. 1914c. Ants collected by W. M. Mann in the state of Hidalgo, Mexico. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 22: 37-61 (page 57, worker, male described)
References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics
- Dattilo W. et al. 2019. MEXICO ANTS: incidence and abundance along the Nearctic-Neotropical interface. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2944
- Fernandes, P.R. XXXX. Los hormigas del suelo en Mexico: Diversidad, distribucion e importancia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
- Vásquez-Bolaños M. 2011. Lista de especies de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) para México. Dugesiana 18: 95-133