.jpg){kind=logo}
Proceratium kepingmai
| Proceratium kepingmai | |
|---|---|
| |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Hymenoptera |
| Family: | Formicidae |
| Subfamily: | Proceratiinae |
| Tribe: | Proceratiini |
| Genus: | Proceratium |
| Species: | P. kepingmai |
| Binomial name | |
| Proceratium kepingmai Staab, Xu & Hita Garcia, 2018
| |
Both known specimens of this species were collected in secondary mixed evergreen broad-leaved forest of relatively advanced age, as indicated by the presence of large trees. The paratype was collected within the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve (Yu et al. 2001, Bruelheide et al. 2011, Staab 2014), one of the larger remaining fragments of subtropical broad-leaved forest in southeast China. The forest at this locality (the type locality is a similar but much smaller forest fragment) is on sloped land and rich in plant species; more than 250 woody species have been recorded on about 8000 ha. Approximately 50% of the woody species are deciduous but the tree layer is dominated by evergreen species including Castanopsis eyrei (Fagaceae) (Champ. ex Benth.) Tutch., Cyclobalanopsis glauca (Fagaceae) (Thunb.) Oerst., Machilus thunbergii (Lauraceae) Sieb. et Zucc., and Schima superba (Theaceae) Gardn. et Champ. No direct observations of biology and natural history are available for P. kepingmai.
Identification
Staab et al. (2018) - A member of the Proceratium itoi clade. Links to data, images and a 3D model of this species are noted (and linked to) in the Type Material section below.
Proceratium kepingmai differs from the other members of its clade by the following character combination: large species (TL 4.39–4.54); sides of head weakly convex, broadest at level of eyes and gently narrowing anteriorly and stronger posteriorly; vertex almost straight; very reduced eyes (OI 2–3) consisting of a single minute ommatidium; frontal carinae well developed, with large lamellae that extend laterally above the antennal insertions; frontal furrow darker than the surrounding anterior cephalic dorsum; posterodorsal corners of the propodeum broadly angular; propodeal declivity densely punctured, mostly opaque; posterior face of petiolar node in profile steeper than anterior face and about half as long as anterior face; apex of petiolar node distinctly broader than long in dorsal view; in addition to dense pubescence, erect hairs present on scapes and dorsal surface of body, longest of those hairs at most as long as the maximum dorsoventral diameter of metafemur.
Proceratium kepingmai is the largest (WL 1.14–1.24) member of the Proceratium itoi clade and has, even for eye-bearing Proceratium, very minute eyes (OI 2–3). From each of the species in the clade with very similar body proportions (particularly indices) that also have erect hairs on the dorsal surface of the body (Proceratium itoi, Proceratium longmenense, Proceratium malesianum, Proceratium bruelheidei; no erect hairs, only dense pubescence in Proceratium williamsi, Proceratium zhaoi) it can safely be separated by one or more characters. In 'Proceratium kepingmai the posterodorsal corner of the propodeum is angular (rounded in Proceratium itoi and Proceratium malesianum), which is also the case for Proceratium longmenense and Proceratium bruelheidei. However, Proceratium longmenense lacks erect hairs on the scape (at least some erect hairs present in Proceratium kepingmai and Proceratium bruelheidei), has a relatively narrower head (CI 85) with longer scapes (SI 68) (CI 92–93 and SI 60–62 in Proceratium kepingmai), and frontal carinae that touch each other at their anteriormost level (clearly separated in Proceratium kepingmai and Proceratium bruelheidei). With Proceratium bruelheidei, the most similar species, Proceratium kepingmai also shares the broad frontal carinae that have large lamellae and are conspicuously extended laterally above the antennal insertions (not extended and narrower in Proceratium longmenense. In contrast, Proceratium kepingmai differs from Proceratium bruelheidei by the shape of the head in full-face view that has convex sides, which are broadest at the level of the eyes and narrow weakly anteriorly and more strongly posteriorly towards to almost straight vertex (sides straight, not narrowing anteriorly and vertex convex in Proceratium bruelheidei), the densely punctured and mostly opaque propodeal declivity (sparsely and superficially punctured and very shiny in Proceratium bruelheidei), the conspicuous frontal furrow that is darker than the rest of the surrounding anterior cephalic dorsum (inconspicuous and of same color in Proceratium bruelheidei), the posterior face of petiolar node in profile steeper than the anterior face of the node and about half as long as the anterior face (posterior face as steep as anterior face and less than half as long in Proceratium bruelheidei), the apex of the petiolar node that is clearly broader than long in dorsal view (less broad than long in Proceratium bruelheidei), and relatively fewer and shorter erect hairs (see Proceratium bruelheidei for details).
Variation. Apart from the small difference in body size (WL 1.14 vs. 1.24) there is no observable variation between the two specimens.
Keys including this Species
Distribution
Latitudinal Distribution Pattern
Latitudinal Range: 29.247222° to 29.124444°.
| North Temperate |
North Subtropical |
Tropical | South Subtropical |
South Temperate |
- Source: AntMaps
Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists
Palaearctic Region: China (type locality).
Distribution based on AntMaps
Distribution based on AntWeb specimens
Check data from AntWeb
Countries Occupied
| Number of countries occupied by this species based on AntWiki Regional Taxon Lists. In general, fewer countries occupied indicates a narrower range, while more countries indicates a more widespread species. |
|
Estimated Abundance
| Relative abundance based on number of AntMaps records per species (this species within the purple bar). Fewer records (to the left) indicates a less abundant/encountered species while more records (to the right) indicates more abundant/encountered species. |
|
Biology
Castes
Worker
Proceratium.png)
X-ray micro-CT scan 3D model of Proceratium kepingmai (worker) prepared by the Economo lab at OIST.
See on Sketchfab. See list of 3D images.
 Staab et al. 2018. Figure 13. Still images from surface display volume renderings of 3D model of Proceratium kepingmai holotype worker (CASENT0790031). A Body in profile B Body in dorsal view C Head in dorsal view D Head in anterodorsal view E Head in anterior view F Head in ventral view G Head in profile H Mesosoma in profile I Mesosoma in dorsal view J Propodeum in posterodorsal view K Abdominal segment II and parts of III in profile L Abdominal segment II and parts of III in dorsal view M Abdominal segments II–VII in profile N Abdominal segment III and parts of II and IV in dorsal view O Abdominal segments II–VII in ventral view. |
Nomenclature
The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.
- kepingmai. Proceratium kepingmai Staab, Xu & Hita Garcia, in Staab, et al. 2018: 157, figs. 5B, 7A, 7C, 12, 13, 24 (w.) CHINA (Jiangxi, Zhejiang).
- Type-material: holotype worker, 1 paratype worker.
- Type-locality: holotype China: Jiangxi Prov., nr Xingangshan, ca 15 km. SE Wuyuan, 29°7’28’’N, 117°54’40’’E, 270 m., 26.iii.2015, MS1836, Winkler (M. Staab); paratype China: Zhejiang Prov., Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, ca 30 km. NW Kaihua, 29°14’50’’N, 118°8’10’’E, 665 m., 27.iv.2015, MS1859, Winkler (M. Noack).
- Type-depositories: SFCY (holotype); CASC, SFCY, MNHU (paratypes).
- Distribution: China.
Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.
Description
Worker
Holotype. TL 4.39; EL 0.02; SL 0.57; HL 0.92; HLM 1.08; HW 0.86; WL 1.14; MFeL 0.71; MTiL 0.60; MBaL 0.44; PeL 0.45; PeW 0.36; LT3 0.64; LS4 0.32; LT4 1.08; OI 2; CI 92; SI 60; MFeI 83; MTiI 70; MBaI 51; DPeI 80; IGR 0.30; ASI 169. Paratype. TL 4.54; EL 0.03; SL 0.59; HL 0.98; HLM 1.14; HW 0.90; WL 1.24; MFeL 0.79; MTiL 0.65; MBaL 0.48; PeL 0.46; PeW 0.37; LT3 0.65; LS4 0.34; LT4 1.05; OI 3; CI 93; SI 62; MFeI 88; MTiI 72; MBaI 53; DPeI 80; IGR 0.33; ASI 161. In full-face view, head slightly longer than broad (CI 92– 93), sides weakly convex, broadest at the eye level and gently narrowing anteriorly and (stronger) posteriorly, vertex weakly convex, almost straight. Clypeus reduced and narrow, with a broadly triangular median anterior projection. Frontal carinae relatively short, moderately separated, slightly covering antennal insertions, constantly diverging posteriorly, lateral expansions of anterior part of frontal carinae developed as broad lamellae, raised, conspicuously and broadly extending laterally above antennal insertions; frontal area convex; frontal furrow well developed as a raised carina, starting at the clypeal projection and extending over the anterior 2/5 of the cephalic dorsum, with a short gap at the level where the lamellae of frontal carinae are broadest. Eyes reduced, minute (OI 2–3), consisting of a single ommatidium and located on midline of head. Antennae 12-segmented, scapes short (SI 60–62), not reaching posterior head margin and thickening apically. Mandibles elongate and triangular, masticatory margin with four teeth in total, apical tooth long and acute, the other teeth smaller and decreasing in size from second to fourth tooth, gap between second and third tooth larger than between other teeth.
Mesosoma in profile slightly convex and slightly longer than maximum head length including mandibles (WL 1.14–1.24 vs. HLM 1.08–1.14). Lower mesopleurae (katepisterna) with well-demarcated sutures, upper mesopleurae (anepisterna) with inconspicuous sutures, no other sutures developed on lateral and dorsal mesosoma; lower mesopleurae weakly inflated posteriorly; posterodorsal corner of propodeum broadly angular, propodeal lobes weakly developed as bluntly rounded lamellae; propodeal declivity almost vertical, slightly inclined anteriorly; in posterodorsal view sides of propodeum separated from declivity by distinct lamellate margins; in profile propodeal spiracle rounded, at mid height, opening of spiracle slightly facing posteriorly. Legs moderately long; all tibiae with a pectinate spur; calcar of strigil without a basal spine; pretarsal claws simple; arolia present.
Petiolar node in profile high, nodiform, with a straight and sloping anterior face, dorsum of node broadly rounded, posterior face half as long and steeper than anterior face; petiole in dorsal view longer than broad but apex of node clearly broader than long; ventral process moderately developed on anterior petiole, with a relatively indistinct rectangular projection.
In dorsal view abdominal segment III anteriorly much broader than petiole; its sides convex; abdominal sternite III anteriomedially with a conspicuous depression marked by a thin rim. Constriction between abdominal segments III and IV deep. Abdominal segment IV very large, recurved (IGR 0.30–0.33) and posteriorly strongly rounded, with a lamella on its anterior border around the constriction to abdominal segment III, this lamella thicker ventrally than dorsally; abdominal tergum IV 1.6–1.7× longer than abdominal tergum III (ASI 161–169); remaining abdominal tergites and sternites inconspicuous and projecting anteriorly. Sting large and extended.
Whole body covered with dense mat of short, decumbent to suberect pubescent hairs; additionally, the dorsal surfaces of body interspersed with significantly longer suberect and erect hairs, such hairs also present on abdominal sterna III + IV, scapes (anterior faces of scapes with many hairs, posterior faces with single hairs), and legs (ventral faces of femora and tibiae with many hairs, dorsal faces with single hairs); the longest hairs on dorsal surface of body at most as long as the maximum dorsoventral diameter of metafemur. Mandibles striate; entire body including propodeal declivity densely punctate; on sides of pronotum punctures aligned in diffuse lines, appearing striate; punctures on antennae, legs, and abdominal segment IV finer than on rest of body, abdominal segments V–VII very superficially punctured and shiny. Body color uniformly orange brown to reddish brown, vertex of head slightly darker, frontal furrow conspicuously darker than surrounding cephalic dorsum, legs, antennal funiculus, and abdominal segments V–VII yellowish brown.
Type Material
Holotype. Pinned worker from CHINA, Jiangxi Province, near the village Xingangshan, ca. 15 km SE of Wuyuan, 29°7'28"N / 117°54'40"E, 270 m asl, secondary subtropical mixed forest, Winkler leaf litter extraction, 26-III-2015, leg. Michael Staab, label “MS1836” (CASENT0790031), deposited in Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China. Paratype. Pinned worker from CHINA, Zhejiang Province, Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, ca. 30 km NW of Kaihua, 29°14'50"N / 118°8'10"E, 665 m asl, secondary subtropical mixed forest, Winkler leaf litter extraction, 27-IV-2015, leg. Merle Noack, label “MS1859” (CASENT0790032), deposited in Berlin Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität.
Cybertype. Volumetric raw data (in DICOM format), a 3D rotation video (in .mp4 format, see Suppl. material 5: Video 3), still images of surface volume rendering, a 3D surface (in PLY format), and montage photos illustrating the head, profile and dorsal views of the body of the physical holotype (CASENT0790031) were all generated as part of this study. Data and images are freely available for download from a Dryad repository (there is a download link at the top right of the webpage) and a 3D surface model of the holotype can be viewed online at Sketchfab.
Etymology
The species epithet is a patronym in honor of the Chinese botanist Prof. Keping Ma and his efforts in establishing the BEF-China project and promoting biodiversity research and nature conservation in China. All specimens of this species were collected in old-growth subtropical forest, an ecosystem Prof. Ma has investigated in detail.