Rogeria stigmatica

AntWiki: The Ants --- Online
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rogeria stigmatica
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Myrmicinae
Tribe: Solenopsidini
Genus: Rogeria
Species: R. stigmatica
Binomial name
Rogeria stigmatica
Emery, 1897

Rogeria-stigmata-MCZ001L.jpg

Rogeria-stigmata-MCZ001D.jpg

Specimen Label

Synonyms

Most collections come from berlesate or sifting of leaf mould, rotten wood, soil, moss, or bases of fern epiphytes in rain forest. The one nest series with ecological data (Sorong, Irian Jaya) is from rotten wood. Mann (1921:451) found colonies beneath stones and logs. Twelve specimens, were collected on imported coconuts in Honolulu. If nesting occurs in coconuts, colonization of Polynesia and Melanesia from South America may have occurred by rafting on the South Equatorial Current. Mann (1921:451) observed workers producing long, worm-like stands from the anal area when the nest was disturbed. (Kugler 1994)

Identification

Kugler (1994) - stigmatica species group. WL 0.72-0.92mm. Mandibles usually subtriangular. EL usually ≥ 0.10mm. Propodeal spiracle ≤ half its diameter from edge of infradental lamella. Propodeal spines short (PSI 0.07-0.13), strongly inclined dorsad. Metapleural lobes much reduced. Inferior petiolar process absent. Abundant decumbent hair on head, mesosoma, waist and gaster; erect hairs rather sparse, not flexuous.

See Rogeria megastigmatica, Rogeria ciliosa and Rogeria gibba for similar South America species and Rogeria exsulans for a not so related species from the Pacific.

Keys including this Species

Distribution

Rogeria stigmatica is known only from the Central and West Pacific, from as far east as Tahiti to the western tip of the Island of New Guinea and from about 22°S to 7°N (Kugler 1994).

Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists

Australasian Region: New Caledonia.
Indo-Australian Region: American Samoa, Fiji, French Polynesia, Indonesia, Micronesia (Federated States of), New Guinea (type locality), Niue, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Tonga, Vanuatu, Wallis and Futuna Islands.


Distribution based on AntMaps

AntMapLegend.png

Distribution based on AntWeb specimens

Check data from AntWeb

Biology

The following is modified from Kugler (1994): Little is known about these cryptic ants. Collection records typically range from sea level to 1000m, but five species extend higher and two (Rogeria unguispina and Rogeria merenbergiana) can be found at 2000m. Rogeria are generally collected in moist forests (primary or secondary forests, coffee or cacao plantations), but at higher elevations can be found in pastures (Rogeria leptonana, Rogeria merenbergiana). Several species (Rogeria creightoni, Rogeria cuneola, Rogeria foreli) have been found in moist and dry climates. Rogeria foreli is the most unusual, with some members dwelling at over 1800m in the temperate mountains of southern Arizona.

Most species have only been collected as strays or by Berlese or Winkler sampling, from leaf litter and rotten wood, but occasionally among epiphytes and moss (Rogeria belti, creightoni, Rogeria exsulans). Nests of several species (belti, Rogeria blanda, merenbergiana) have been found under the loose bark of rotten logs. Nests of blanda and Rogeria tonduzi have been taken from the trunks of cacao trees. A nest of Rogeria leptonana was found at 1750m under a rock in a pasture.

Nests are rarely found. Males are known for only four species (belti, blanda, leptonana and Rogeria stigmatica) and queens associated through nest series for only nine species.

Castes

Worker

Nomenclature

The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.

  • stigmatica. Rogeria stigmatica Emery, 1897c: 589 (w.) NEW GUINEA. Mann, 1919: 342 (q.m.). Senior synonym of manni, sublevinodis: Kugler, C. 1994: 33.
  • sublevinodis. Rogeria stigmatica subsp. sublevinodis Emery, 1914f: 415 (w.) NEW CALEDONIA (Loyalty Is). Wheeler, G.C. & Wheeler, J. 1955b: 28 (l.). Raised to species: Wilson & Taylor, 1967: 76. Junior synonym of stigmatica: Kugler, C. 1994: 33.
  • manni. Rogeria manni Santschi, 1922b: 353 (footnote) (w.) SOLOMON IS. Combination in Lordomyrma: Brown, 1953h: 4. Junior synonym of stigmatica: Kugler, C. 1994: 33.

Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.

Kugler (1994) - According to Emery (1914) and Wilson and Taylor (1967), Rogeria sublevinodis differs from Rogeria stigmatica in having larger size, coarser sculpture on head and mesosoma, and smooth nodes with coarser punctures on other parts of the waist. When two of Emery's stigmatica syntypes and two of his sublevinodis syntypes in the Musee d'Histoire Naturelle Genève were compared side by side, the TL and WL of the Rogeria stigmatica syntypes fell within the range of the Rogeria sublevinodis syntypes. The sculptural characteristics were not distinct either, except on the dorsal face of the propodeum, which is transversely rugulose and very weakly punctate and shiny in stigmatica syntypes, but densely punctate and lacking rugulae in the sublevinodis syntypes. However, intergrades with rugulae and various degrees of punctation occur in the Solomon Islands, Irian Jaya, and Pohnpei.

Santschi (1922) claimed that Rogeria manni differed from stigmatica in a variety of ways. After examining manni types, I could confirm only one clear way they differ from the types of stigmatica and sublevinodis: the presence of rugose sculpture instead of areolate sculpture on the promesonotum. However, in non-type material, I found all intermediate states, sometimes within the same locality. Other supposedly different characters also intergrade or are due to the manni types being at the small end of the size distribution.

I have too few collections from Papua New Guinea to know if those specimens with unusually small eyes and few erect hairs on gaster T1 might be a distinct species.

Description

Worker

Kugler (1994) - TL 3.0-3.7, HL 0.66-0.83, HW 0.58-0.71, SL 0.46-0.61, EL 0.05-0.15 (7-34 facets), PW 0.44-0.52, WL 0.72-0.92, SpL 0.05-0.10, PetL 0.32-0.42, PpetL 0.19-.23mm, CI 0.84-0.92, OI 0.08- 0.22, SI 0.79-0.87, PSI 0.07-0.13. N=28

Kugler 1994 fig 7-14

Mandibles subtriangular (usually) to triangular; with 5 subequal teeth or 3 apical teeth followed by 3-4 (rarely 5) smaller teeth or denticles. Palpal formula 3,3. Little or no clypeal apron; median clypeal margin truncate, weakly convex, or weakly angular. Body of clypeus not projecting over clypeal margin. Eyes oval, large (EL 0.10-0.15mm and 17- 34 facets), except in some of the Papua New Guinea workers (EL 0.05-0.07mm; 7-9 indistinct facets). Nuchal groove distinct from behind, but not clear in side view. Promesonotum with evenly convex profile. Metanotal suture narrow, emphasized by a sharp ridge at anterior edge of propodeum. Node large, wider than long, more or less symmetrical in side view (Fig. 8). Postpetiolar node in side view rounded front to back; usually widest in anterior half, much as in Fig. 66, but sometimes widest midlength. Postpetiolar sternum short. Sting apparatus like that of ciliosa (Fig. 3), except for: 1) spiniform medial and and lateral projections from anterodorsal corner of quadrate plates, 2) smaller valve chamber, and 3) lack of anterolateral processes on sting base (Fig. 9). Gonostylus sometimes with no clear sensillar gap; sometimes lacking a companion seta. The "Rogeria (stigmatica group) spp. 1 and 2" in Kugler (1978b) are both stigmatica. The sting shown here is more accurate than the previous one, which was not in full lateral orientation when drawn.

Middorsum of head longitudinally rugose; rest of head, including venter, coarsely areolate. Dorsum of promesonotum coarsely areolate to rugose (intermediate specimens predominantly areolate, but with elongate cells or short rugae medially; rarely, rugae also occur on shoulders). Anterior and sides of mesosoma areolate, finely so on neck and ventrad on meso- and metapleura. Spaces in sculpture smooth except for piligerous punctures. Dorsal face of propodeum areolate along very anterior margin, followed by either transversely rugulose or densely punctate sculpture, or both in varying degrees of density and definition. Petiolar peduncle finely colliculate or smooth. Anterior and apex of node smooth or areolate; posterior face and sides areolate, sometimes with a few rugae. Postpetiole transversely rugose-areolate behind, becoming more effaced anteriorly, often leaving anterior face smooth and shining.

Decumbent to subdecumbent pilosity covers most of body. Sparser erect to suberect hair also on dorsa of scapes, head, mesosoma, nodes, and gaster. Erect hair moderately abundant on gaster T1 of most specimens (Fig. 8), but sparse on specimens from Papua New Guinea. Body of clypeus with strong median seta.

Color of mandibles, frontoclypeal region, antennae, and legs light brownish-yellow to brown. Rest of body light brown to blackish-brown.

Queen

Kugler (1994) - TL 3.6-4.5, HL 0.73-0.85, HW 0.66-0.75, SL 0.53-0.62, EL 0. 19-0.24, PW 0.60-0.71, WL 1.00-1 .17, SpL 0.10, PetL 0.41-0.48, PpetL 0.21-0.26mm, CI 0.87-0.90, SI 0.80-0.84, PSI 0.09-0.10. N=6

As in worker except for the usual caste differences. Mesosoma habitus as in Fig. 10. Queen from McAdam Park, Papua New Guinea with median bulge on pronotum. Pronotum areolate on sides; finer and transversely rugose-areolate mesad. Mesoscutum longitudinally rugose; mesoscutellum areolate-rugose. Metanotum smooth. Mesosoma sides confused areolate, except for smooth area on mesokatepisterna and costulate metapleural gland bullae. Wing venation as in lirata (Fig. 30), except for Rs vein as in belti (Fig. 37).

Male

Kugler (1994) - TL 2.6-3.1, HL 0.45-0.54, HW 0.56-0.66 SL 0.27-0.35, EL 0.20-0.26, PW 0.50-0.62, WL 0.84-1.04, PetL 0.22-0.30, PpetL 0.14-0.19mm, CI 1 .22-1.27, SI 0.48-0.53. N=3

Mandibles with a large apical tooth and 4 others decreasing in size basad. Posterior lobe of clypeus projects more broadly between antennae than in worker; anterior clypeal margin weakly convex. Frontal lobes absent. No distinctly impressed frontal area. Funicular segment 6 curved and longer than 4 and 7; more extremely curved and elongate on one side of the head than the other. Posterior outline of head medially concave; sharp crests run from ocelli to posteroventral corners of head, which project slightly and fit around prothoracic sternum when head is retracted. Mesosoma and waist as shown in Fig. 11. Genitalia as shown in Fig. 12. Head integument vaguely roughened. Mesosoma and waist smooth, except along furrows and on sides of propodeum, metepimera, and petiolar peduncle. Gaster smooth and shining. Pilosity all erect to suberect, except around eyes. Propodeum nude. Color variation as in worker.

Type Material

Kugler (1994) :

Syntype workers, NEW GUINEA: Friedrich-Wilhelmshafen [=Madang] (Biró) Musee d'Histoire Naturelle Genève [Both syntypes examined].

Rogeria stigmatica subsp. sublevinodis Emery 1914:415. Syntype workers, LOYALTY ISLANDS: Maré, Raoua MHNG [Both syntypes examined].

Rogeria manni Santschi 1922:353. Syntypeworkers, SOLOMON ISLANDS: Fulakora, Ysabel Is. (Mann) Museum of Comparative Zoology, Naturhistorisches Museum, Basel [12 syntypes examined].

References

  • Kugler, C. 1994. A revision of the ant genus Rogeria with description of the sting apparatus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Hym. Res. 3: 17-89 (page 33, Senior synonym of sublevinodis and manni)
  • Mann, W. M. 1919. The ants of the British Solomon Islands. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 63: 273-391 (page 342, queen, male described)

References based on Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics

  • Abbott K.L., S.N.J. Greaves, P.A. Ritchie, P.J. Lester. Behaviourally and genetically distinct populations of an invasive ant provide insights into invasion history and impacts on a tropical ant community. Biological Invasions 9: 453-463.
  • Abbott KL, Greaves SNJ, Ritchie PA, Lester PJ. 2007. Behaviorally and genetically distinct populations of an invasive ant provide insight into invasion history and impacts on a tropical ant community. Biological Invasions 9:453-463
  • Abbott, K.L., M. Sarty and P.J. Lester. 2006. The ants of Tokelau. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 33:157-164.
  • CSIRO Collection
  • Chapman, J. W., and Capco, S. R. 1951. Check list of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Asia. Monogr. Inst. Sci. Technol. Manila 1: 1-327
  • Cheesman L. E., and W. C. Crawley. 1928. A contribution towards the insect fauna of French Oceania. - Part III. Formicidae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 10(2): 514-525.
  • Chessman, L. E. and Crawley, W. C. 1928. A Contribution towards the Insect Fauna of French Oceania. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 2(10):514-525.
  • Clouse R. M. 2007. The ants of Micronesia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Micronesica. 39: 171-295.
  • Clouse, R.M. 2007. The ants of Micronesia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Micronesica 39(2): 171-295.
  • Collingwood, C. A. and Van Harten, Antonius. 2001. The Ants (Hym., Formicidae)of Niue, Souh West Pacific. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine. 137:139-143.
  • Dlussky G.M. 1994. Zoogeography of southwestern Oceania. Zhivotnoe naselenie ostrovov Iugo-Zapadnoi Okeanii ekologo-geograficheskie issledovanii 48-93.
  • Emery C. 1897. Formicidarum species novae vel minus cognitae in collectione Musaei Nationalis Hungarici quas in Nova-Guinea, colonia germanica, collegit L. Biró. Természetrajzi Füzetek 20: 571-599.
  • Emery C. 1914. Formiche d'Australia e di Samoa raccolte dal Prof. Silvestri nel 1913. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura. Portici 8: 179-186.
  • Emery, C. 1914. Les fourmis de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et des îles Loyalty. Nova Caledonia. A. Zoologie 1:393-437.
  • Field Museum Collection, Chicago, Illinois (C. Moreau)
  • Janda M., G. D. Alpert, M. L. Borowiec, E. P. Economo, P. Klimes, E. Sarnat, and S. O. Shattuck. 2011. Cheklist of ants described and recorded from New Guinea and associated islands. Available on http://www.newguineants.org/. Accessed on 24th Feb. 2011.
  • Jennings J. T., L. Krogmann, and C. Burwell. 2013. Review of the hymenopteran fauna of New Caledonia with a checklist of species. Zootaxa 3736(1): 1-53.
  • Kami K.S., and S. E. Miller. 1998. Samoan insects and related arthropods: checklist and bibliography. Bishop Museum Technical Report 13, pp 121.
  • Kami KS & Miller SE. 1998. Samoan insects and related arthropods: checklist and bibliography. Bishop Museum Technical Report No. 13.
  • Klimes P., P. Fibich, C. Idigel, and M. Rimandai. 2015. Disentangling the diversity of arboreal ant communities in tropical forest trees. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0117853. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117853
  • Kugler C. 1994. A revision of the ant genus Rogeria with description of the sting apparatus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 3: 17-89.
  • Lester, Philip J. et al. 2009. Competitive assembly of South Pacific invasive ant communities. BMC Ecology. 1-27.
  • Lester, Phillip F., and Tavite, Alapati. 2004. Long-Legged Ants, Anoplolepis gracilipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Have Invaded Tokelau, Changing Composition and Dynamics of Ant and Invertebrate Communities. Pacific Science. 58:3:391–401.
  • Lucky A., E. Sarnat, and L. Alonso. 2011. Ants of the Muller Range, Papua New Guinea, Chapter 10. In Richards, S. J. and Gamui, B. G. (editors). 2013. Rapid Biological Assessments of the Nakanai Mountains and the upper Strickland Basin: surveying the biodiversity of Papua New Guinea’s sublime karst environments. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 60. Conservation International. Arlington, VA.
  • Lucky A., K. Sagata, and E. Sarnat. 2011. Ants of the Nakanai Mountains, East New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea, Chapter 1. In Richards, S. J. and Gamui, B. G. (editors). 2013. Rapid Biological Assessments of the Nakanai Mountains and the upper Strickland Basin: surveying the biodiversity of Papua New Guinea’s sublime karst environments. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 60. Conservation International. Arlington, VA.
  • Mann W. M. 1919. The ants of the British Solomon Islands. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 63:273-391.
  • Mann W. M. 1921. The ants of the Fiji Islands. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 64: 401-499.
  • Mann William. 1916. The Ants of the British Solomon Islands. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 63(7): 273-391
  • Mann, W.M. 1919. The ants of the British Solomon Islands. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard College 63: 273-391
  • Morrison L. W. 1996. The ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Polynesia revisited: species numbers and the importance of sampling intensity. Ecography 19: 73-84.
  • Morrison L. W; 2008. Patterns of nestedness in remote Polynesian ant faunas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pacific Science 62(1): 117-127.
  • Morrison L.W. 1997. Polynesian ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) species richness and distribution: a regional survey. Acta Oecologica 18(6): 685-695.
  • Morrison LW. 2008. Patterns of Nestedness in remote Polynesian ant faunas. Pacific Science 117-127.
  • Morrison LW. 2008. Patterns of nestedness in remote Polynesian ant faunas. Pacific Science 62(1):117-127.
  • Perrault G.H. 1988. Les fourmis de Tahiti. Bull. Soc. Zool. France 112(3-4): 430-446.
  • Ramage T. 2014. Les fourmis de Polynesie francaise (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 119 (2): 145-176.
  • Santschi F. 1919. Cinq notes myrmécologiques. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 52: 325-350.
  • Santschi F. 1922. Myrmicines, dolichodérines et autres formicides néotropiques. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 54: 345-378.
  • Santschi F. 1928. Formicidae (Fourmis). Insects Samoa. 5: 41-58.
  • Sarnat Eli M. 2009. The Ants [Hymenoptera: Formicdiae] of Fiji: Systematics, Biogeography and Conservation of an Island Arc Fauna. 80-252
  • Snelling R. R. 1998. Insect Part 1: The social Hymenoptera. In Mack A. L. (Ed.) A Biological Assessment of the Lakekamu Basin, Papua New Guinea, RAP 9. 189 ppages
  • Snelling R. R. 2000. Ants of the Wapoga river area, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. In Mack, Andrew L. and Leeanne E. Alonso (eds.). 2000. A Biological Assessment of the Wapoga River Area of Northwestern Irian Jaya, Indonesia. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 14, Conservation International, Washington, DC.
  • Taylor R. W. 1976. The ants of Rennell and Bellona Islands. Natural History of Rennell Island, British Solomon Islands 7: 73-90.
  • Taylor R. W. 1987. A checklist of the ants of Australia, New Caledonia and New Zealand (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization) Division of Entomology Report 41: 1-92.
  • Viehmeyer H. 1912. Ameisen aus Deutsch Neuguinea gesammelt von Dr. O. Schlaginhaufen. Nebst einem Verzeichnisse der papuanischen Arten. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Königlichen Zoologischen und Anthropologische-Ethnographischen Museums zu Dresden 14: 1-26.
  • Ward D. 2008. Ecological partitioning and invasive ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a tropical rain forest ant community from Fiji. Pacific Science 62(4): 473-482.
  • Ward, Darren F. and James K. Wetterer. 2006. Checklist of the Ants of Fiji. Fiji Arthropods III 85: 23-47.
  • Ward, Darren and Beggs, Jacqueline. 2007. Coexistence, habitat patterns and the assembly of ant communities in the Yasawa islands, Fiji. Ant Oecologica. 32:215-223.
  • Wetterer, James K. 2002. Ants of Tonga. Pacific Science. 56.2: 125-135.
  • Wetterer, James K. 2006. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Niue, Polynesia. Pacif Science. 60:(3)413-416.
  • Wetterer, James K. and Vargo, Donald Vargo L. 2003. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Samoa. Pacific Science. 57(4):409-419.
  • Wheeler W.M. 1935. Check list of the ants of Oceania. Occasional Papers of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum 11(11):1-56.
  • Wheeler, W. M. 1927. The ants of Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 62: 121-153
  • Wheeler, William Morton. 1927. The Ants of Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 62(4): 121-153
  • Wheeler, William Morton. 1932. Ants from the Society Islands. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin. 113:13-19.
  • Wheeler, William Morton.1935.Checklist of the Ants of Oceania.Occasional Papers 11(11): 3-56
  • Wilson E. O.; Taylor, R. W. 1967. The ants of Polynesia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pacific Insects Monograph 14:1-109.
  • Wilson E.O., and G.L. Hunt. 1967. Ant fauna of Futuna and Wallis islands, stepping stones to Polynesia. Pacific Insects 9(4): 563-584.
  • Wilson EO & Hunt GL. 1967. Ant fauna of Futuna and Wallis Islands, stepping stones to Polynesia. Pacific Insects 9.4: 563-584.
  • Wilson EO, Hunt GL. 1967. Ant fauna of Futuna and Wallis Islands, stepping stones to Polynesia. Pacific Insects 9.4: 563-584.
  • Wilson EO, Taylor RW. 1967. The ants of Polynesia. Pacific Insects Monograph 14:1-109.
  • Wilson, Edward O. and George L. Hunt. 1967. Ant Fauna of Futuna and Wallis Islands, Stepping Stones To Polynesia. Pacific Insects. 9(4):563-584.
  • Wilson, Edward O. and Hunt, George L. Jr. 1967. Ant Fauna of Futuna and Wallis Islands, Stepping Stones to Polynesia. Pacific Insects. 9(4):563-584