Technomyrmex albipes

Every Ant Tells a Story - And Scientists Explain Their Stories Here
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Technomyrmex albipes
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Dolichoderinae
Genus: Technomyrmex
Species: T. albipes
Binomial name
Technomyrmex albipes
(Smith, F., 1861)

Technomyrmex albipes casent0178469 profile 1.jpg

Technomyrmex albipes casent0178469 dorsal 1.jpg

Specimen labels


Bolton (2007) - T. albipes is an extremely successful tramp species that nests and forages both terrestrially and arboreally, and may enter houses. Workers may be found under stones, in and under fallen wood and in tree stumps, on the forest floor and in the leaf litter, on low vegetation and in twigs, on tree trunks and up into the canopy. A single record is known from internodes of the myrmecophyte Humboldtia laurifolia, from Gilimale in Sri Lanka. They also colonise more restricted spaces such as plant spathes and rot holes in wood and they attend a wide range of homopterous insects for honeydew. Although usually regarded as a pest or invasive species, for instance Sulaiman (1997) observes that it tends the mealybug responsible for pineapple wilt disease in Sri Lanka, albipes also has value as an important predator of the eggs of destructive insect species on coconuts in Sri Lanka (Way, Cammell, et al. (1989).


Bolton (2007) - A member of the T. albipes complex in the Technomyrmex albipes group. Colour of the mandibles and antennae is variable in albipes. The mandible varies from the same dark colour as the head capsule to yellowish, with all intermediate shades present. The scape is usually about the same shade as the head capsule; the funiculus may be the same colour or entirely lighter, or the apical few segments alone may be lighter. These variations are gradient and are not considered taxonomically significant.

In the past many samples of small, darkly coloured Technomyrmex in which the gaster is setose and the tarsi are white or yellow have been misidentified as T. albipes, but in particular albipes has been confused with Technomyrmex vitiensis, Technomyrmex difficilis, Technomyrmex pallipes, Technomyrmex brunneus, Technomyrmex jocosus and Technomyrmex moerens. The first three of these are also common tramp species and vitiensis was for a while considered ajunior synonym of albipes. T. vitiensis, along with its Afrotropical relative moerens, closely resembles albipes, but both have larger eyes, longer scapes and a longer promesonotum than to albipes. Also, the mesonotal profile in albipes workers is evenly curved, whereas in both other species there tends to be an angle or step in the outline, resulting in differently sloped dorsal and declivitous mesonotal faces; see also the notes under vitiensis. As for difficilis, the presence in that species of a pair of setae on the dorsal head behind the level of the posterior margin of the eye easily distinguishes them. However, workers of difficilis in which the head is abraded are difficult to distinguish from albipes; see notes under difficilis. T. pallipes should not be confused with albipes as it always has two pairs of short stubbly setae on the dorsal head behind the level of the posterior margin of the eye. T. brunneus has mandibular grooves not seen in albipes, as well as other different characters, and jocosus has a very different arrangement of setae: neither should be confused with albipes.

Keys including this Species


Distribution based on Regional Taxon Lists

Afrotropical Region: Cameroun, Ivory Coast, Mozambique, South Africa, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Yemen.
Australasian Region: Australia.
Indo-Australian Region: Borneo, Cook Islands, Fiji, Guam, Hawaii, Indonesia (type locality), Krakatau Islands, Malaysia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), New Guinea, Niue, Philippines, Pitcairn, Solomon Islands, Sulawesi, Tokelau, Wallis and Futuna Islands.
Malagasy Region: Madagascar, Mauritius, Réunion, Seychelles.
Neotropical Region: Cayman Islands.
Oriental Region: Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Laos, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Vietnam.
Palaearctic Region: China, Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, Denmark, Japan, Republic of Korea.

Distribution based on AntMaps


Distribution based on AntWeb specimens

Check data from AntWeb


Sharaf et al. (2018): Technomyrmex albipes nests and forages in and beneath fallen wood and rocks, in tree trunks, in leaf litter, in twigs, on the forest floor, on low vegetation, and into the canopy (Bolton 2007). The species is known to feed on honeydew of a broad range of sap sucking attended hemipterans including the mealybug vectors of pineapple wilt disease (Sulaiman 1997).


Bolton (2007) - Distinct morphological intercastes between workers and queens, such as are relatively common in Technomyrmex vitiensis, Technomyrmex moerens, Technomyrmex brunneus, Technomyrmex pallipes and other species of the albipes group, where ocelli are present and the mesoscutellum and metanotum are developed as separate or semi-separate sclerites in otherwise worker-like forms, appear absent from material examined of genuine albipes. Only a few basically very worker-like forms with slightly posteriorly expanded mesonota have been seen. This observation may be merely a sampling artifact indicating that most albipes material examined has been of foragers, not from nest samples, as in other species where intercastes have been confirmed they are confined to reproductive behaviour within colonies and do not undertake foraging activities. However, 24 samples provided in alcohol by Martin Pfeiffer (Universitat Ulm), collected at Banting, West Malaysia and Tawau, Sabah, East Malaysia, failed to produce a single obvious intercaste, although many of the samples included brood and fragments of nest material; one had brood and ergatoid males in it and another contained a dealate queen.





The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's New General Catalogue, a catalogue of the world's ants.

  • detorquens. Formica detorquens Walker, 1859: 372 (q.) SRI LANKA. Combination in Technomyrmex: Donisthorpe, 1932b: 575. Senior synonym of forticulus: Donisthorpe, 1932b: 575. Nomen oblitum, synonym of albipes: Bolton, 2007a: 68. See also: Wilson & Taylor, 1967: 84.
  • forticulus. Crematogaster forticulus Walker, 1859: 372 (q., not w.) SRI LANKA. Junior synonym of detorquens: Donisthorpe, 1932b: 576; nomen oblitum, synonym of albipes: Bolton, 2007a: 68.
  • albipes. Formica (Tapinoma) albipes Smith, F. 1861b: 38 (w.) INDONESIA (Sulawesi). Forel, 1891b: 98 (q.); Forel, 1908a: 21 (ergatoid m.); Karavaiev, 1926d: 441 (m.); Wheeler, G.C. & Wheeler, J. 1951: 205 (l.); Crozier, 1969: 245 (k.). Combination in Tapinoma: Mayr, 1863: 455; in Technomyrmex: Emery, 1888d: 392. Senior synonym of nigrum: Mayr, 1872: 147; Mayr, 1876: 83; of albitarse: Emery, 1893f: 249; of bruneipes, detorquens, forticulus, wedda: Bolton, 2007a: 68.
  • nigrum. Tapinoma nigrum Mayr, 1862: 703 (w.) SRI LANKA. Junior synonym of albipes: Mayr, 1872: 147; Mayr, 1876: 83; Bolton, 2007a: 68.
  • albitarse. Tapinoma albitarse Motschoulsky, 1863: 14 (w.q.) SRI LANKA. Junior synonym of albipes: Emery, 1893f: 249.
  • bruneipes. Technomyrmex albipes var. bruneipes Forel, 1895e: 466 (w.q.m.) INDIA. Raised to species: Collingwood & Agosti, 1996: 361. Junior synonym of albipes: Bolton, 2007a: 68.
  • wedda. Technomyrmex albipes r. wedda Forel, 1913e: 663 (w.q.) SRI LANKA. Junior synonym of albipes: Bolton, 2007a: 68.

Type Material

Bolton (2007) - Syntype workers, Indonesia: Sulawesi, “Tond” (= Tondano) (A.R. Wallace) (Oxford University Museum of Natural History) [examined].

Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.



Bolton (2007) - TL 2.4 - 2.9, HL 0.56 - 0.63, HW 0.52 - 0.58, SL 0.48 - 0.58, PW 0.35 - 0.42, WL 0.66 - 0.78 (50 measured). Indices: CI 87 - 95, SI 91 - 102, or 24 - 27, EPI 70 - 88, DTI 110 - 124.

Frontal carina with 2 (very rarely 3) setae: in profile the anteriormost seta at the torulus, the posteriormost seta approximately at the level of the anterior margin of the eye. Dorsum of head posterior to this entirely lacks setae. With head in full-face view the anterior clypeal margin with a very weak, shallow median indentation; sides of head shallowly convex and the posterior margin with a small shallow indentation medially. Eyes located in front of midlength, EPI < 90; outer margin of eye usually just fails to break, or sometimes just touches, the outline of the side. With mesosoma in profile the mesonotal outline is evenly curved, without a distinct step or angle in the outline that defines conspicuous dorsal and declivitous faces. Number of setal pairs on mesosoma: pronotum 1 - 3; mesonotum 0 1 (usually 0); propodeal dorsum 0; lateral margins of propodeal declivity 1 - 2 (very rarely 3), usually with one just above the spiracle, another higher up. With the propodeum in profile its dorsum and declivity meet in a short, blunt, but very narrowly rounded curve, not a distinct sharp angle. Straight-line length of propodeal dorsum in profile is less than depth of declivity to spiracle. Gastral tergites 1 - 4 each with numerous setae, distributed everywhere on the sclerites; maximum length of setae on first gastral tergite is usually slightly less than the maximum diameter of the eye but sometimes the two are subequal. Head, mesosoma, petiole and gaster blackish brown to black; in profile the gaster is often slightly lighter than the mesosoma. Coxae, femora and tibiae uniformly blackish brown to black, same colour as the mesosoma or gaster; never with strongly contrasting lighter coxae. Tarsi of middle and hind legs white to dull yellowish, paler than the tibiae.


  • n = 9 (Spain) (Lorite et al., 2012) (as Tapinoma nigerum).
  • n = 9, 2n = 18, karyotype = 16M+2A (Australia) (Crozier, 1968a) (seven medium-size chromosomes metacentric and two small chromosomes one metacentric and one acrocentric.).
  • 2n = 16 (Australia) (Imai et al., 1977).
  • 2n = 16, karyotype = 16M (India) (Imai et al., 1984).

Determination Clarifications

The correct identities of some species referred to as albipes in relatively recent publications can be ascertained with some degree of certainty, but those of earlier studies (e.g. Starcke, 1940), and even some more recent ones (e.g. Brophy, 1994) in the absence of the relevant specimens, must remain equivocal. Material mentioned as introductions in British hothouses by Donisthorpe (1927) consists of series of albipes, Technomyrmex vitiensis and Technomyrmex pallipes. References to albipes in recent Chinese and Japanese works such as Imai, Hikara, Kondoh, et al. (2003), Zhou (2001), Wu & Wang (1995) and the intensive studies by Tsuji, Furukawa, et al. (1991), Yamauchi, Furukawa, et al. (1991), Tsuji & Yamauchi (1994) and Ogata. Murai, et al. (1996), are all Technomyrmex brunneus. Also referable to brunneus is Radchenko’s (2005) record of “albipes” from North Korea. The discussions of albipes in Bourke & Franks (I 995}, based on these Japanese publications, should also be referred to brunneus. Recent Australian references to albipes in Shattuck (1999), and Andersen's (2000) unnamed fig. 29 are probably all Technomyrmex difficilis and this is also the species which has recently colonised Florida so successfully (Deyrup, 1991; Vail, Davis, et al., 1994; DeyruJl, Davis & Cover, 2000; Warner, 2003). The species referred to as albipes by Brown (l958) in New Zealand is probably Technomyrmex jocosus. The short discussion of albipes by Shattuck (1992b) appears to be a fusion of several species; it certainly includes vitiensis as that is the only species known to occur in conservatories in Golden Gate Park, California. The vast amount of Pacific Islands material listed in Wilson & Taylor (1967) certainly includes both albipes and vitiensis, and probably also difficilis; a critical re-assessment of the entire collection would be needed to resolve the identities. Terron (1972) presented some notes on alate and ergatoid males of a species close to albipes, which may refer to Technomyrmex moerens or perhaps even pallipes.


  • Bolton, B. 2007b. Taxonomy of the dolichoderine ant genus Technomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) based on the worker caste. Contributions of the American Entomological Institute. 35(1): 1-149.
  • Crozier, R. H. 1969a [1968]. Cytotaxonomic studies on some Australian dolichoderine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Caryologia 21: 241-259 (page 245, karyotype described)
  • Donisthorpe, H. 1932b. On the identity of some ants from Ceylon described by F. Walker. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 10(9): 574-576 (page 575, Junior synonym of detorguens)
  • Emery, C. 1888d. Über den sogenannten Kaumagen einiger Ameisen. Z. Wiss. Zool. 46: 378-412 (page 392, Combination in Technomyrmex)
  • Emery, C. 1893h. Voyage de M. E. Simon à l'île de Ceylan (janvier-février 1892). Formicides. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 62: 239-258 (page 249, Senior synonym of albitarse)
  • Forel, A. 1891c. Les Formicides. [part]. In: Grandidier, A. Histoire physique, naturelle, et politique de Madagascar. Volume XX. Histoire naturelle des Hyménoptères. Deuxième partie (28e fascicule). Paris: Hachette et Cie, v + 237 pp. (page 98, queen described)
  • Forel, A. 1908b. Fourmis de Ceylan et d'Égypte récoltées par le Prof. E. Bugnion. Lasius carniolicus. Fourmis de Kerguelen. Pseudandrie? Strongylognathus testaceus. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 44: 1-22 (page 21, ergatoid male described)
  • Karavaiev, V. 1926d. Ameisen aus dem Indo-Australischen Gebiet. Treubia 8: 413-445 (page 441, male described)
  • Mamet, R. 1954. The ants (Hymenoptera Formicidae) of the Mascarene Islands. Mauritius Inst. Bull. 3: 249-259 (see also)
  • Mayr, G. 1863a. Formicidarum index synonymicus. Verh. K-K. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 13: 385-460 (page 455, Combination in Tapinoma)
  • Mayr, G. 1872. Formicidae Borneenses collectae a J. Doria et O. Beccari in territorio Sarawak annis 1865-1867. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. 2: 133-155 (page 147, Senior synonym of nigrum)
  • Mayr, G. 1876. Die australischen Formiciden. J. Mus. Godeffroy 12: 56-115 (page 83, Senior synonym of nigrum)
  • Sharaf, M.R., Al Dhafer, H.M., Aldawood, A.S. 2018. Review of the ant genus Technomyrmex Mayr, 1872 in the Arabian Peninsula (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 780: 35–59 (DOI10.3897/zookeys.780.26272).
  • Sharaf, M. R.; Collingwood, C. A. and Aldawood, S. A. 2011. Technomyrmex montaseri sp. n., a new ant species of the T. gibbosus-group from Oman (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) with a key to the Technomyrmex species of the Arabian Peninsula. ZooKeys. 108:11-19. PDF
  • Shattuck, S. O. 1994. Taxonomic catalog of the ant subfamilies Aneuretinae and Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 112:i-xix, 1-241. (page 157, see also)
  • Smith, F. 1861b. Catalogue of hymenopterous insects collected by Mr. A. R. Wallace in the islands of Ceram, Celebes, Ternate, and Gilolo. [part]. J. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 6: 36-48 (page 38, worker described)
  • Tsuji, K.; Furukawa, T.; Kinomura, K.; Takamine, H.; Yamauchi, K. 1991. The caste system of the dolichoderine ant Technomyrmex albipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): morphological description of queens, workers and reproductively active intercastes. Insectes Sociaux 38: 413-422. (= T. brunneus)
  • Yamane, S., Leong, C.-M., Lin, C.C. 2018. Taiwanese species of the ant genus Technomyrmex (Formicidae: Dolichoderinae). Zootaxa 4410: 35–56 (DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.4410.1.2).
  • Wheeler, G. C.; Wheeler, J. 1951. The ant larvae of the subfamily Dolichoderinae. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 53: 169-210 (page 205, larva described)
  • Wilson, E. O.; Taylor, R. W. 1967b. The ants of Polynesia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pac. Insects Monogr. 14: 1-109 (page 82, Senior synonym of rufescens and vitiensis, Revived from synonymy)