Philidris

AntWiki: The Ants --- Online

Philidris is most common in forested areas where it is often associated with Myrmecophytes (especially the plant genera Myrmecodia and Dischidia). Unfortunately, the species within this genus have received little attention, either biologically or taxonomically.

At a Glance • Haiku  

Photo Gallery

  • Philidris sp. nesting with Dischidia sp.
  • Dealate queen of Philidris th01 from Thailand, surrounded by brood and workers (Photo by Christian Peeters).

Identification

Shattuck (1992) - Worker: Polymorphic (less commonly monomorphic), majors with ocelli; compound eyes placed relatively anterior on head; anterolateral clypeal margin posterior to the mediolateral region and separated from it by a shoulder; anteromedial clypeal margin with a central projection, either pointed or rounded (sometimes only feebly projecting); mandibles with 10 to 12 teeth, 0 to 3 denticles, and the basal angle weakly defined by a denticle. Extreme eastern India east through southeast Asia to the Philippine Islands, northern Australia and the Solomon Islands.

Queen: Anterolateral clypeal margin posterior to the mediolateral region and separated from it by a shoulder (sometimes weakly developed); anterior clypeal margin with about 20 short, erect setae; mandible with 7 to 10 teeth, 2 or 3 denticles, and the apical tooth subequal in length to the subapical; about 20 to 50 short, erect setae on mesoscutum; first gastral segment with a partial groove for the reception of the basal portion of the petiole. Male: Mandible with one tooth (the apical), about 10 to 12 denticles, and with the apical tooth subequal to or longer than the subapical tooth or denticle; venter of petiole with a well developed lobe; first gastral segment elongate posteriorly.

Philidris differs from Iridomyrmex in the placement of the compound eyes, the shape of the vertex, the prevalence of worker caste polymorphism, and the degree of anterior inclination of the petiolar scale. Additionally, workers of this genus tend to have a larger number of long, erect pronotal hairs compared to lridomyrmex species.

AntWeb icon 02.png See images of species within this genus

Keys including this Genus

 

Distribution

Extreme eastern India east through southeast Asia to the Philippine Islands, northem Australia and the Solomon Islands.

Distribution and Richness based on AntMaps

Species by Region

Number of species within biogeographic regions, along with the total number of species for each region.

Afrotropical Region Australasian Region Indo-Australian Region Malagasy Region Nearctic Region Neotropical Region Oriental Region Palaearctic Region
Species 0 1 11 0 0 0 4 3
Total Species 2840 1735 3042 932 835 4378 1740 2862

Biology

Nesting Habits

These ants commonly nest in specialized ant plants. For example, Peeters and Wiwatwitaya (2014) document a fascinating ant-plant mutualism in SE Asia involving Philidris living in modified leaves of the epiphyte Dischidia major. These pitchers or domatia are easily defended and available for home improvements. A root grows inside the domatia to absorb nitrogenous wastes from the ants. Upon the slightest disturbance a large number of ants stream out with open mandibles, thus providing protection for host plants.

Ant presence was associated with both extensive root development and a variable quantity of debris. Pitchers offer a large empty space, much of which is unavailable to the ants and their brood unless they structure it. Philidris workers build internal partitions by using the roots as framework. Pitchers become spatially divided into many compartments, and close contact between roots and debris is appropriate for absorption, thus maximizing trophic benefits for the host plants.

The presence of inhabited Dischidia pitchers in the 30 m high crown of Dipterocarpus trees attests to the flying and searching ability of Philidris founding queens.

Peeters and Wiwatwitaya (2014) assumed that adjacent pitchers are all part of the same colony but did not investigate whether there can be other clusters belonging to the same colony on the same tree.


  • Dischidia epiphytes from Thailand. Photo by Christian Peeters.
  • Soil runways are built by the ants to connect the entrances of adjacent pitchers, thus leading to large colonies. Photo by Christian Peeters.
  • Philidris nest interior, in Dischidia. Photo by Christian Peeters.

Ant Gardens

Six unidentified species of Philidris from peninsular Malaysia are known to form ant-gardens (i.e., they are able to initiate ant gardens or are restricted to ant gardens) (Kaufmann at al., 2001; Kaufmann, 2002 (noted as ant-garden initiator); Kaufmann & Maschwitz, 2006; Orivel & Leroy, 2011).

Life History Traits

  • Mean colony size: 18000 (Greer et al., 2021)
  • Compound colony type: not parasitic (Greer et al., 2021)
  • Nest site: hypogaeic; arboreal (Greer et al., 2021)
  • Diet class: omnivore (Greer et al., 2021)
  • Foraging stratum: subterranean/leaf litter; arboreal (Greer et al., 2021)
  • Foraging behaviour: cooperative (Greer et al., 2021)

Castes

Queens are much bigger than workers, with large bulbous compound eyes comprising 300 – 350 ommatidia, compared with the smaller eyes of workers (50 – 60 ommatidia). Queens also have three prominent ocelli on top of the head. Thorax volume of queens is 28 times greater than that of workers (Peeters & Wiwatwitaya 2014). Queens are highly fecund with about 40 ovarioles. A maximum of six dealate, mated queens were collected together in the same pitcher.

Morphology

Worker Morphology

Explore-icon.png Explore: Show all Worker Morphology data or Search these data. See also a list of all data tables or learn how data is managed.

• Antennal segment count: 12 • Antennal club: gradual • Palp formula: 6,4 • Total dental count: 9-12(+) • Spur formula: 1 simple, 1 pectinate • Eyes: 11-100 ommatidia • Scrobes: absent • Pronotal Spines: absent • Mesonotal Spines: absent • Propodeal Spines: absent • Petiolar Spines: absent • Caste: many polymorphic • Sting: absent • Metaplural Gland: present • Cocoon: absent

Karyotype

All Karyotype Records for Genus

Explore-icon.png Explore: Show all Karyotype data or Search these data. See also a list of all data tables or learn how data is managed.
Click here to show/hide karyotype data.
Taxon Haploid Diploid Karyotype Locality Source Notes
Philidris cordata 16 Malaysia Imai et al., 1983 as ''Iridomyrmex cordatus''
Philidris cordata 16 Sarawak Tjan et al., 1986 as ''Iridomyrmex cordatus''

Phylogeny

Dolichoderinae
Tapinomini
Bothriomyrmecini
Dolichoderini

Dolichoderus  (150 species, 51 fossil species)

Leptomyrmecini

See Phylogeny of Dolichoderinae for details.

Nomenclature

The following information is derived from Barry Bolton's Online Catalogue of the Ants of the World.

  • PHILIDRIS [Dolichoderinae: Leptomyrmecini]
    • Philidris Shattuck, 1992a: 17. Type-species: Formica cordata, by original designation.

Unless otherwise noted the text for the remainder of this section is reported from the publication that includes the original description.

Description

Worker

HEAD. Vertex concave. Compound eyes present, approximately round; relatively anterior on head. Ocelli present (in major). Antennae 12 segmented. Scape short, at most surpassing the vertex by less than one-third its length. Anterolateral clypeal margin posterior to the mediolateral region and separated from it by a shoulder. Anteromedial clypeal margin with a central projection, either pointed or rounded (often weakly developed). Anterior clypeal setae 4- 10; short, less than twice the maximum scape diameter; straight. Posterior clypeal margin between the anterior and posterior surfaces of the antennal socket cavities. Anterior tentorial pit nearer the antennal socket than the mandibular insertion. Frontal carina present. Anterolateral hypostoma reduced to a thin sclerite. Medial hypostoma entire. Psammophore absent. MOUTHPARTS. Palp formula 6:4. Third maxillary palp segment subequal in length to segment 4. Fifth maxillary palp segment at the apical extreme of segment 4. Mandible with 10-12 teeth and 0-3 denticles. Apical tooth slightly longer than the subapical tooth. Basal angle weakly defined by a denticle. Basal margin denticulate distally, smooth proximally. MESOSOMA. Posteroventral pronotum lateral, rounded or angled. Mesopleural process absent. Anteromedial mesosternum even with the lateral regions. Declivitous and dorsal faces of propodeum convex; dorsal face subequal in length to the declivitous face. Propodeal angle indistinct. Mesosomal spines and tooth absent. Erect pronotal hairs 8-24; elongate, much longer than the maximum scape width. Dorsal pro-mesonotal junction with the pronotum and mesonotum even, or with the mesonotum above the pronotum. Metanotal groove forming a distinct angle between the mesonotum and propodeum. Metanotal spiracle dorsal and lying on the dorsal surface when viewed in lateral profile. Propodeal spiracle lateral and ventral of the propodeal dorsum. Hind tibial spur with well developed barbules along entire inner surface (except extreme base). PETIOLE. Scale present; ridged and with a distinct angle dorsally; strongly inclined anteriorly and with the anterior face much shorter than the posterior face. Venter with a well developed lobe. GASTER. First tergite vertical and not concealing the petiole in dorsal view and with a groove or indentation for the reception of the basal portion of the petiole. Anteriortergosternal suture of the first segment extending laterally from the helcium in a distinct arch which extends dorsal ofthe dorsal helcial surface. Fifth tergite ventral, gaster with 4 apparent tergites. Gastral compression absent (gaster circular in cross section). Fourth stemite flat across entire posterior border. GENERAL CHARACTERS. Worker caste polymorphic or less commonly monomorphic. Chromosome number 8 (2n=16, P. cordatus, Imai et al. 1985a, Tjan et al. 1986). Integument thin and flexible, weakly sculptured. PROVENTRICULUS. Cupola much broader than bulb; round; with short pile; smooth, without sculpture; and with very broad phragma. Bulb completely hidden by cupola in lateral view. Occlusory tract absent.

Queen

HEAD. Vertex weakly concave. Compound eyes relatively anterior on head. Antennae 12 segmented. Scape short, surpassing the vertex by less than one- half scape length. Anterolateral clypeal margin posterior to the mediolateral region and separated from it by a shoulder. Anteromedial clypeal margin either entire (without a central notch or concavity of any type) or with a central projection, either pointed or rounded (sometimes only feebly projecting). Anterior clypeal setae 20; short, less than twice the maximum scape diameter; straight. Posterior clypeal margin even with or posterior to the posterior surfaces of the antennal socket cavities. Anterior tentorial pit nearer the antennal socket than the mandibular insertion. Anterolateral hypostoma reduced to a thin sclerite. Medial hypostoma entire. Psammophore absent. MOUTHPARTS. Palp formula 6:4. Third maxillary palp segment subequal in length to segment 4. Fifth maxillary palp segment at the apical extreme of segment 4. Mandible with 7- 10 teeth and 2-3 denticles. Apical tooth subequal in length to the subapical tooth. Basal angle distinct, with a well developed tooth or angle separating the masticatory and basal margins. Basal margin denticulate distally, smooth proximally. MESOSOMA. Posteroventral pronotum lateral, rounded or angled. Episternal suture varying from complete (but weakly developed anteriorly) to weak and nearly absent. Mesopleural process absent. Anteromedial mesosternum even with the lateral regions. Axilla parallel and entire. Anterior axillar suture straight. Declivitous and dorsal faces of propodeum convex; dorsal face subequal in length to the declivitous face. Propodeal angle indistinct. Propodeal suture absent. Mesosomal spines and tooth absent. Erect mesoscutal hairs about 20-50; short, less than twice the maximum scape diameter. Propodeal spiracle lateral and ventral of the propodeal dorsum. Hind tibial spur with well developed barbules along entire inner surface (except extreme base). WINGS. Radial cell closed. Fore wing with 2 cubital and 1 discoidal cells. Hind wing with 2-3 cells. PETIOLE. Scale present; ridged and with a distinct angle dorsally; varying from moderately inclined anteriorly (but with the anterior and posterior faces approximately the same length) to strongly inclined anteriorly (and with the anterior face much shorter than the posterior face). Venter with a well developed, rounded lobe. GASTER. First segment vertical and not concealing the petiole in dorsal view and with a groove or indentation for the reception of the basal portion of the petiole. Fifth tergite ventral, gaster with 4 apparent tergites. Gastral compression absent (gaster circular in cross section). Fourth sternite flat across entire posterior border.

Male

HEAD. Inner margin of eye entire, flat (or sometimes weakly angular). Scape length shorter than the length offunicular segments 2+3. First funicular segment barrel-shaped. Second funicular segment cylindrical, straight. Funicular segments 2 and 3 at most twice as long as broad. Third and fourth funicular segments straight. Anteromedial clypeal margin entire, without a central notch or concavity of any type. Anterior clypeal setae 4; short, about as long as the maximum diameter of the scape; straight. Posterior clypeal margin between the anterior and posterior surfaces of the antennal socket cavities. Anterior tentorial pit nearer the antennal socket than the mandibular insertion. Anterolateral hypostoma reduced to a thin sclerite. Medial hypostoma entire. MOUTHPARTS. Palp formula 6:4. Third maxillary palp segment subequal in length to segment 4. Fifth maxillary palp at the apical extreme of segment 4. Mandible with one tooth (the apicaQ and about 10-12 very small denticles. Apical tooth (or denticle) subequal in length to, or slightly longer than, the subapical tooth. Basal angle indistinct, with a relatively uninterrupted curve between the two margins and without a distinct tooth or angle. Basal margin smooth and without teeth or denticles. MESOSOMA. Posteroventral pronotum lateral, rounded or angled. Episternal suture present, complete. Anteromedial mesosternum even with the lateral regions. Axilla parallel and entire. Anterior axillar suture straight. Declivitous and dorsal faces of propodeum convex. Propodeal angle indistinct. WINGS. Radial cell closed. Fore wing with 1 cubital and 1 discoidal cell. Pterostigmal appendage absent. Hind wing with 2 cells. PETIOLE. Scale present; ridged and with a distinct angle dorsally; vertical and not inclined anteriorly. Venter with a well developed lobe. Attachment to gaster broad. GASTER. First segment elongated posteriorly, smooth and without a groove or indentation. GENITALIA. Pygostyles present. Posterior margin of subgenital plate concave. Paramere divided by a weak membranous region. Digitus linear, with a slight ventral arch. Cuspis parallel with digitus. Ventral lobe of volsella present as concave lobe. Aedeagus with ventral teeth.

Larva

Protuberances present as 5 bosses located mid-dorsally. Body hairs sparse; simple; short.

References

  • Bolton, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 222 pp. (page 26, Philidris in Dolichoderinae, Dolichoderini)
  • Bolton, B. 1995a. A taxonomic and zoogeographical census of the extant ant taxa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Nat. Hist. 2 29: 1037-1056 (page 1051, Philidris in Dolichoderinae, Dolichoderini)
  • Bolton, B. 1995b. A new general catalogue of the ants of the world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 504 pp. (page 334, Philidris in Dolichoderinae, Dolichoderini)
  • Bolton, B. 2003. Synopsis and Classification of Formicidae. Mem. Am. Entomol. Inst. 71: 370pp (page 90, Philidris in Dolichoderinae, Dolichoderini)
  • Cantone S. 2018. Winged Ants, The queen. Dichotomous key to genera of winged female ants in the World. The Wings of Ants: morphological and systematic relationships (self-published).
  • Chomicki, G., Janda, M., Renner, S.S. 2017. The assembly of ant-farmed gardens: mutualism specialization following host broadening. Proc. R. Soc. B 284: 20161759 (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.1759).
  • Dubovikoff, D.A. 2005. The system of taxon Bothriomyrmex Emery, 1869 sensu lato (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and relatives genera. Kavkazskii Entomologicheskii Byulleten 1(1): 89-94 (page 92, Philidris in Dolichoderinae, Iridomyrmecini)
  • Ghosh, S.N. & Sheela, S. 2008. On a collection of Formicidae (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) from Buxa Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India, with new records of one rare genus and a rare species. Asian Myrmecology, 2, 99-102.
  • Kaufmann, E. 2002. Southeast Asian ant-gardens: diversity, ecology, ecosystematic significance, and evolution of mutualistic ant-epiphyte associations. – PhD Thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 203 pp.
  • Kaufmann, E., Weissflog, A., Hashim, R. & Maschwitz, U. 2001. Ant-gardens on the giant bamboo Gigantochloa scortechinii (Poaceae) in West-Malaysia. Insectes Sociaux 48: 125-133.
  • Kaufmann, E., Maschwitz, U. 2006. Ant-gardens of tropical Asian rainforests. Naturwissenschaften 93: 216-227.
  • Lorite, P., Palomeque, T. 2010. Karyotype evolution in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a review of the known ant chromosome numbers. Myrmecological News 13: 89-102.
  • Orivel, J., Leroy, C. 2011. The diversity and ecology of ant gardens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Spermatophyta: Angiospermae). Myrmecological News 14: 73-85.
  • Peeters, C. & D. Wiwatwitaya 2014. Philidris ants living in Dischidia epiphytes from Thailand. Asian Myrmecology 6: 49-61.
  • Shattuck, S. O. 1992a. Review of the dolichoderine ant genus Iridomyrmex Mayr with descriptions of three new genera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 31: 13-18 (page 17, Philidris as genus)
  • Shattuck, S. O. 1992c. Generic revision of the ant subfamily Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 21: 1-181 (page 140, Philidris in Dolichoderinae, Dolichoderini)
  • Shattuck, S. O. 1994. Taxonomic catalog of the ant subfamilies Aneuretinae and Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 112:i-xix, 1-241. (page 135, Philidris in Dolichoderinae, Dolichoderini)